Frontage Roads: Assessment of Legal Issues, Design Decisions, Costs, Operations, and Land-Development Differences

A policy of building frontage roads alongside freeway mainlanes avoids the purchase of access rights when upgrading existing highways to freeway standards and can supplement local street networks. It also may affect corridor operations, land values, and development patterns. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of frontage-road design policies by (1) summarizing research results related to legal statutes affecting public access to roadways, (2) discussing access policies and practices across the states, (3) comparing land development and operations of corridors with and without frontage roads, (4) summarizing studies on access-right valuation, and (5) comparing total construction costs. In a literature review, a wide variety of options are available to agencies for limiting access to and improving flow and safety along freeway corridors. In statistical analyses of paired corridors, land near frontage roads is associated with lower household incomes, lower population densities, lower percentages of bike trips to work, lower vehicle occupancies for work trips, and higher unemployment rates than those without frontage roads. Lower employment densities along freeway corridors also emerged when frontage roads were present. Operational simulations of various freeway systems demonstrated that frontage roads may improve the operation of freeway mainlanes in heavily developed areas but not in moderately developed areas (e.g., mainly residential). Arterial systems in these simulations were supplemented by frontage roads and thus also performed better. The financial costs associated with frontage road facilities were considerably higher than those associated with non-frontage-road facilities, except in cases of extremely high access-right-of-way values. These results, in addition to efforts by other researchers, should assist in constructing a solid, formal policy for all states and regions to follow in providing access along new and existing freeways in the future.

[1]  D L Bowman,et al.  ACCESS MANAGEMENT: TRANSPORTATION POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR A GROWING VIRGINIA , 1998 .

[2]  J C Vance RIGHTS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER UPON CONVERSION OF UNCONTROLLED-ACCESS ROAD INTO LIMITED-ACCESS HIGHWAY , 1987 .

[3]  Kristine M Williams TEN WAYS TO MANAGE ROADWAY ACCESS IN YOUR COMMUNITY , 2000 .

[4]  A. Williams Transport, rights-of-way and compensation: injurious affection from an economic perspective and some Australian evidence of freeway impacts; part II , 1993 .

[5]  Brian L Bowman,et al.  EFFECT OF URBAN AND SUBURBAN MEDIAN TYPES ON BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY , 1994 .

[6]  H. D. Vorster,et al.  ACCESS MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE: THE PRETORIA EXPERIENCE , 1997 .

[7]  P. Newsome ACCESS MANAGEMENT - DOCUMENTING PRACTICES EXTERNAL TO MINNESOTA , 1997 .

[8]  C J Messer,et al.  DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR RAMP METERING. INTERIM REPORT , 1994 .

[9]  Kara M. Kockelman Investigation of the Impact of Frontage Roads as an Element of Controlled Access Facilities , 2002 .

[10]  G Long,et al.  SAFETY IMPACTS OF SELECTED MEDIAN AND ACCESS DESIGN FEATURES. FINAL REPORT , 1993 .

[11]  Transportation Officials,et al.  A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 1984 , 1984 .

[12]  Kristine M Williams,et al.  LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT PROMOTE ACCESS MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[13]  Jerry Gluck,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF ACCESS MANAGEMENT AT SELECTED STATE DOTS , 1996 .

[14]  S. Vadali,et al.  LAND VALUE AND LAND USE EFFECTS OF ELEVATED, DEPRESSED, AND AT-GRADE LEVEL FREEWAYS IN TEXAS , 1997 .

[15]  A H Parham,et al.  PROCEDURES TO DETERMINE FRONTAGE ROAD LEVEL OF SERVICE AND RAMP SPACING , 1996 .

[16]  H. Kaltenbach THE ELASTIC RIGHT - ACCESS , 1967 .

[17]  Michael David Lloyd Assessment of TRAF-NETSIM for analyzing arterial weaving between ramp terminals and cross streets , 1995 .

[18]  R W Stokes CORRIDOR PRESERVATION FOR TWO-LANE RURAL HIGHWAYS , 1995 .

[19]  G. Sokolow,et al.  MODEL LAND DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS THAT SUPPORT ACCESS MANAGEMENT FOR FLORIDA CITIES AND COUNTIES , 1994 .

[20]  Robert H Whitson,et al.  A real-time frontage road progression analysis and control strategy , 1974 .

[21]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  ONE-SIDED WEAVING OPERATIONS ON ONE-WAY FRONTAGE ROADS , 1996 .

[22]  L. Kors ACCESS MANAGEMENT PROJECT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA , 1996 .

[23]  H L Westerman ROADS AND ENVIRONMENTS , 1990 .

[24]  R. Machemehl,et al.  A MODEL FOR ESTIMATING THE VALUE OF PROPERTY ACCESS RIGHTS. FINAL REPORT , 1995 .

[25]  A. Eisdorfer NEW JERSEY STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT CODE TO PRESERVE CORRIDOR ACCESSIBILITY AND MANAGE ECONOMIC GROWTH , 1997 .

[26]  J M Mounce,et al.  CONSIDERATIONS IN THE APPLICATION OF COLLECTOR-DISTRIBUTOR DESIGNS FOR IMPROVING MAINLANE FREEWAY OPERATIONS. INTERIM REPORT , 1992 .

[27]  Charles Pinnell,et al.  EVALUATION OF FRONTAGE ROADS AS AN URBAN FREEWAY DESIGN ELEMENT , 1963 .

[28]  Ross D. Netherton Control of highway access , 1963 .

[29]  C. S. Papacostas,et al.  Transportation Engineering and Planning , 1992 .

[30]  P D Pant,et al.  METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ACCESS MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES , 1998 .

[31]  J A Crawford,et al.  Corridor Preservation: A Review of Strategies for Texas , 1996 .

[32]  H. Levinson,et al.  ACCESS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN CONNECTICUT , 1996 .