Historical Tensions in Engineering Education: European Perspectives

Ever since institutions for educating engineers first began to be ­established in Europe, there have been a number of fundamental tensions as to how that ­educating should best be conducted, what it should consist of, and who should do the educating. These tensions are based on different styles or approaches to ­engineering education that have developed historically in different parts of Europe and which have led to what we characterize as “theory-driven,” “practice-driven,” and “technology-driven” approaches. This chapter explores some of the historical roots of these tensions in medieval Europe and briefly traces their developmental trajectories through the subsequent formation of institutions of engineering ­education. It has been written as part of PROCEED (Program of Research on Opportunities and Challenges in Engineering Education in Denmark).

[1]  F. Redtenbacher,et al.  Prinzipien der Mechanik und des Maschinenbaues , 1852 .

[2]  Thorstein Veblen,et al.  Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution , 1940 .

[3]  T. S. Ashton,et al.  The Industrial Revolution. , 1949 .

[4]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[5]  S. Lilley.  Technological progress and the Industrial Revolution, 1700-1914 , 1970 .

[6]  L. White,et al.  Medieval religion and technology : collected essays , 1980 .

[7]  A. Jamison.  National components of scientific knowledge : a contribution to the social theory of science , 1982 .

[8]  A. Jamison.  National Styles of Science and Technology: A Comparative Model* , 1987 .

[9]  George Ovitt,et al.  The Restoration of Perfection: Labor and Technology in Medieval Culture by George Ovitt, Jr (review) , 1988, Technology and Culture.

[10]  V. Tamari.  Medieval religion and technology , 1988 .

[11]  Kees Gispen,et al.  New Profession, Old Order: Engineers and German Society, 1815–1914 by Kees Gispen (review) , 1991, Technology and Culture.

[12]  U. Hilpert.  State policies and techno-industrial innovation , 1991 .

[13]  Norman Davies,et al.  Europe: A History , 1996 .

[14]  Peter Meiksins,et al.  Engineering Labour: Technical Workers in Comparative Perspective , 1996 .

[15]  D. Noble.  The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention , 1997 .

[16]  P.J.A.N. Rietbergen.  Europe: A Cultural History , 1998 .

[17]  Pamela Olivia Long,et al.  Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance , 2001 .

[18]  Andrew Jamison,et al.  Hubris and Hybrids: A Cultural History of Technology and Science , 2005 .

[19]  J. Sawday.  Engines of the Imagination: Renaissance Culture and the Rise of the Machine , 2007 .

[20]  Ulrik Jørgensen,et al.  Historical Accounts Of Engineering Education , 2007 .

[21]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Rethinking Engineering Education - The CDIO Approach , 2007 .

[22]  Anders Buch.  Engineering in Context , 2009 .

[23]  Andrew Jamison.  The Historiography of Engineering Contexts , 2009 .

[24]  Niels Mejlgaard,et al.  Contextualizing Nanotechnology Education: Fostering a Hybrid Imagination in Aalborg, Denmark , 2010 .

[25]  Jay Winter,et al.  A cultural history , 2012 .

[26]  Wolfgang König.  REULEAUX Franz. Lehrbuch der Kinematik. Bd. 1: Theoretische Kinematik. Grundzüge einer Theorie des Maschinenwesens, 1875; Bd. 2: Die praktischen Beziehungen der Kinematik zu Geometrie und Mechanik, 1900 , 2013 .