Energy and exergy analysis of biomass gasification at different temperatures

Biomass is usually gasified above the optimal temperature at the carbon-boundary point, due to the use of different types of gasifiers, gasifying media, clinkering/slagging of bed material, tar cracking, etc. This paper is focused on air gasification of biomass with different moisture at different gasification temperatures. A chemical equilibrium model is developed and analyses are carried out at pressures of 1 and 10 bar with the typical biomass feed represented by CH1.4O0.59N0.0017. At the temperature range 900–1373K, the increase of moisture in biomass leads to the decrease of efficiencies for the examined processes. The moisture content of biomass may be designated as “optimal” only if the gasification temperature is equal to the carbon-boundary temperature for biomass with that specific moisture content. Compared with the efficiencies based on chemical energy and exergy, biomass feedstock drying with the product gas sensible heat is less beneficial for the efficiency based on total exergy. The gasification process at a given gasification temperature can be improved by the use of dry biomass and by the carbon-boundary temperature approaching the required temperature with the change of gasification pressure or with the addition of heat in the process.

[1]  T. B. Reed,et al.  A survey of biomass gasification , 1979 .

[2]  Robert Palumbo,et al.  Solar Thermochemical Process Technology , 2003 .

[3]  Animesh Dutta,et al.  Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model and Second Law Analysis of a Downdraft Waste Gasifier , 2007 .

[4]  S. Channiwala,et al.  A UNIFIED CORRELATION FOR ESTIMATING HHV OF SOLID, LIQUID AND GASEOUS FUELS , 2002 .

[5]  Dimitrios P. Tassios,et al.  Solid waste plasma gasification: Equilibrium model development and exergy analysis , 2006 .

[6]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Energy and exergy analyses of the oxidation and gasification of carbon , 2005 .

[7]  Carlos Roberto Altafini,et al.  Prediction of the working parameters of a wood waste gasifier through an equilibrium model , 2003 .

[8]  Sotirios Karellas,et al.  An innovative biomass gasification process and its coupling with microturbine and fuel cell systems , 2008 .

[9]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Thermodynamics of gas-char reactions: first and second law analysis , 2003 .

[10]  Peter McKendry,et al.  Energy production from biomass (Part 3): Gasification technologies. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[11]  Wolfgang Krumm,et al.  Autothermal two-stage gasification of low-density waste-derived fuels. , 2007 .

[12]  Sebastian Oberthür,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol , 1999 .

[13]  S. Kersten.  Biomass gasification in circulating fluidized beds , 2002 .

[14]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  From coal to biomass gasification: Comparison of thermodynamic efficiency , 2007 .

[15]  K. N. Seetharamu,et al.  Prediction of performance of a downdraft gasifier using equilibrium modeling for different biomass materials , 2001 .

[16]  Kenneth A. Kobe,et al.  Gas producers and blast furnaces , 1951 .

[17]  T. E. Daubert,et al.  Chemical engineering thermodynamics , 1985 .

[18]  Robert A. Meyers,et al.  Encyclopedia of physical science and technology , 1987 .

[19]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification , 2007 .

[20]  Jesper Ahrenfeldt,et al.  The design, construction and operation of a 75kW two-stage gasifier , 2006 .

[21]  François Maréchal,et al.  Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts , 2009 .

[22]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes , 1988 .

[23]  Philippe Mathieu,et al.  Performance analysis of a biomass gasifier , 2002 .

[24]  D. F. Stewart,et al.  Computer simulation of a downdraft wood gasifier for tea drying , 2003 .