Towards Co-production in research with communities

Summary Co-production has emerged as a potential solution to a criticism that research conducted in communities often fails to meaningfully include communities in its design and undertaking. Co-production is now also perceived as a solution to an argued „relevance gap‟ in research and to the demands of „impact‟. Co-production in research aims to put principles of empowerment into practice, working „with‟ communities and offering communities greater control over the research process and providing opportunities to learn and reflect from their experience. Advocates for co-production argue that research is enhanced through including „experiential expertise‟ (Collins and Evans 2007) which may highlight relevant questions otherwise neglected by „experts‟ (Fischer 2000). Co-production can enhance the effectiveness of research by making it better informed by communities‟ preferences and needs, with communities then contributing to improved outcomes and achievable solutions (Ostrom 1996). This review takes a cross-cutting perspective, aiming to advance the theory and practice of co-production in research with communities.

[1]  Madine Vanderplaat,et al.  Barriers to citizen participation: the missing voices of people living with low income , 2010 .

[2]  Michael Saward,et al.  The Representative Claim , 2010 .

[3]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Response to Critics of When the People Speak: The Deliberative Deficit and What To Do About It , 2010 .

[4]  T. Boeck,et al.  Amplified Leicester: Impact on social capital and cohesion. , 2010 .

[5]  M. Minkler,et al.  Photovoice: A Review of the Literature in Health and Public Health , 2010, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[6]  D. Walker Debate: Do academics know better or merely different? , 2010 .

[7]  S. Martin,et al.  Co-production of social research: strategies for engaged scholarship , 2010 .

[8]  B. Kiteme,et al.  Researchers' roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal , 2010 .

[9]  Vivien Lowndes,et al.  Accountable, authorized or authentic? What do ‘faith representatives’ offer urban governance? , 2009 .

[10]  Kevin Orr,et al.  Reflexivity in the co‐production of academic‐practitioner research , 2009 .

[11]  N. Gilbert,et al.  Innovations in Social Science Research Methods , 2009 .

[12]  Natasha Fijn,et al.  Introduction: The Power of Vision and Voice , 2007 .

[13]  R. Purcell Images for change: community development, community arts and photography , 2007 .

[14]  Peter Hupe,et al.  STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRACY AND PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY , 2007 .

[15]  Sergio L. Schmukler,et al.  Emerging Market Instability : Do Sovereign Ratings Affect Country Risk and Stock Returns ? , 1997 .

[16]  K. Ward Geography and Public Policy: Towards Public Geographies , 2006 .

[17]  James Tansey,et al.  Co-production, emergent properties and strong interactive social research: the Georgia Basin Futures Project , 2006 .

[18]  K. Jones A Biographic Researcher in Pursuit of an Aesthetic : The use of arts-based (re)presentations in "performative" dissemination of life stories / Kip Jones. , 2006 .

[19]  R. Pain Social geography: participatory research , 2004 .

[20]  P. Falzone Transcendent Ethnography , 2004 .

[21]  B. Harrison,et al.  Seeing health and illness worlds – using visual methodologies in a sociology of health and illness: a methodological review , 2002 .

[22]  Liz Richardson,et al.  Outsider and Insider Expertise: The Response of Residents of Deprived Neighbourhoods to an Academic Definition of Social Exclusion , 2002 .

[23]  K. Brock,et al.  Knowing Poverty: Critical Reflections on Participatory Research and Policy , 2002 .

[24]  S. Goss Making Local Governance Work: Networks, Relationships and the Management of Change , 2001 .

[25]  C. Killion,et al.  Linking African American Mothers Across Life Stage and Station Through Photovoice , 2000, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[26]  Jennifer Narayan Deepa Rietbergen-McCracken,et al.  Participation and Social Assessment: Tools and Techniques , 1998 .

[27]  Mark Bovens,et al.  The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations , 1998 .

[28]  G. Stoker Governance as theory: five propositions , 1998 .

[29]  E. Ostrom Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development , 1996 .

[30]  T. Morris Justice and the Politics of Difference , 1992 .

[31]  S. Riger Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. , 1992 .

[32]  K. Lewin Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[33]  F. Fischer Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[34]  K. Schafft,et al.  Can anyone hear us? Voices from 47 countries. , 1999 .

[35]  M. Moore Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .

[36]  Mark H. Moore,et al.  Creating Public Value , 2017 .

[37]  Guildford Gu EXPERIENCE AND METHOD An Inquiry into the Concept of Experiential Research , 1971 .