The Nature of Scientific Meta-Knowledge

We argue that science education should focus on enabling students to develop meta-knowledge about science so that students come to understand how different aspects of the scientific enterprise work together to create and test scientific theories. Furthermore, we advocate that teaching such meta-knowledge should begin in early elementary school and continue through college and graduate school and that it should be taught for all types of science, including the biological, physical, and social sciences.

[1]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Developing Scientific Communities in Classrooms: A Sociocognitive Approach , 1999 .

[2]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .

[3]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. , 1996 .

[4]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Quality Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria , 2007 .

[5]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[6]  Thomas A. Romberg,et al.  Understanding mathematics and science matters , 2005 .

[7]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Groupware for developing critical discussion skills , 1995, CSCL.

[8]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery , 1999, Springer US.

[9]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[10]  J. Dewey How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[11]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Harrie Eijkelhof,et al.  Research and the quality of science education , 2005 .

[13]  Harvey Mellar,et al.  Learning with artificial worlds: computer based modelling in the curriculum , 1994 .

[14]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  The Role of Communication in Learning To Model , 2013 .

[15]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models Volume III , 2009 .

[16]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Causal Model Progressions as a Foundation for Intelligent Learning Environments , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[17]  John W. Moore Science Education Standards , 1998 .

[18]  D. Kuhn Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .

[19]  H. Simon,et al.  Studies of Scientific Discovery: Complementary Approaches and Convergent Findings , 1999 .

[20]  B. White ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[21]  John B. Black,et al.  The Development of Cognitive Skills To Support Inquiry Learning , 2000 .

[22]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Education , 2023 .

[23]  Kathleen Hogan Thinking Aloud Together: A Test of an Intervention to Foster Students' Collaborative Scientific Reasoning , 1999 .

[24]  M. Linn,et al.  Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE , 2000 .

[25]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Dynamic mental models in learning science : The importance of constructing derivational linkages among models , 1999 .

[26]  S. Gilbert Model building and a definition of science , 1991 .

[27]  William McClune,et al.  How Students Learn , 2010 .

[28]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Innovations in learning : new environments for education , 1996 .

[29]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[30]  A. Collins,et al.  Epistemic forms and Epistemic Games: Structures and Strategies to Guide Inquiry , 1993 .

[31]  Susan Carey,et al.  On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .

[32]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[33]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  Modeling Theory in Science Education , 2004 .

[34]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education , 2002 .

[35]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Handbook of Metacognition in Education , 2009 .

[36]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Helping Students Understand Challenging Topics in Science Through Ontology Training , 2006 .

[37]  Alexander Repenning,et al.  AgentSheets: End-User Programmable Simulations , 2000, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[38]  Tina A. Grotzer Learning to Understand the Forms of Causality Implicit in Scientifically Accepted Explanations , 2003 .

[39]  Marcela Borge Regulating social interactions: Developing a functional theory of collaboration , 2007 .

[40]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  A Theoretical Framework and Approach for Fostering Metacognitive Development , 2005 .

[41]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Using Conceptual Models to Facilitate Conceptual Change: The Case of Weight-Density Differentiation , 1992 .

[42]  R. Driver,et al.  Young people's images of science , 1996 .

[43]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[44]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Students’ Criteria for Representational Adequacy , 2002 .

[45]  Ronald D. Anderson Reforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry , 2002 .

[46]  Jessica Thompson,et al.  Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations , 2008 .

[47]  M. Resnick,et al.  Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World , 1999 .

[48]  M. Gertrude Hennessey,et al.  Sixth-Grade Students' Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development , 2000 .

[49]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  How Scientists Build Models In Vivo Science as a Window on the Scientific Mind , 1999 .

[50]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice , 1999 .

[51]  D. Hestenes Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction , 1987 .

[52]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  How Scientists Think in the Real World: Implications for Science Education , 2000 .

[53]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy , 2000 .

[54]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Student goal orientation in learning inquiry skills with modifiable software advisors , 1999 .

[55]  J. Osborne,et al.  Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education , 2002 .

[56]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Supporting Inquiry Processes with an Interactive Learning Environment: Inquiry Island , 2008 .

[57]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  A Systems Approach to Educational Testing , 1989 .

[58]  David Hammer,et al.  Identifying Inquiry and Conceptualizing Students’ Abilities , 2008 .

[59]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Dimensions of Causal Understanding: the Role of Complex Causal Models in Students' Understanding of Science , 2005 .

[60]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[61]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[62]  A. diSessa Metarepresentation: Native Competence and Targets for Instruction , 2004 .

[63]  R. Giere Cognitive Models of Science , 1992 .

[64]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  The role of argument in science education , 2005 .

[65]  R. Glaser Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[66]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[67]  Sibel Erduran,et al.  Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research , 2007 .

[68]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Enabling Students to Construct Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for Metacognitive Development , 1999 .

[69]  B. White,et al.  Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students' Understanding of Scientific Modeling , 2005 .

[70]  R. Glaser Educational design and cognitive science , 2000 .

[71]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[72]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[73]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  Understanding Scientific Reasoning , 1979 .