The Gibbs Paradox and Particle Individuality

A consensus seems to have developed that the Gibbs paradox in classical thermodynamics (the discontinuous drop in the entropy of mixing when the mixed gases become equal to each other) is unmysterious: in any actual situation, two gases can be separated or not, and the associated harmless discontinuity from “yes” to “no” is responsible for the discontinuity. By contrast, the Gibbs paradox in statistical physics continues to attract attention. Here, the problem is that standard calculations in statistical mechanics predict a non-vanishing value of the entropy of mixing even when two gases of the same kind are mixed, in conflict with thermodynamic predictions. This version of the Gibbs paradox is often seen as a sign that there is something fundamentally wrong with either the traditional expression S=klnW or with the way W is calculated. It is the aim of this article to review the situation from the orthodox (as opposed to information theoretic) standpoint. We demonstrate how the standard formalism is not only fully capable of dealing with the paradox, but also provides an intuitively clear picture of the relevant physical mechanisms. In particular, we pay attention to the explanatory relevance of the existence of particle trajectories in the classical context. We also discuss how the paradox survives the transition to quantum mechanics, in spite of the symmetrization postulates.

[1]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  The Gibbs paradox and the distinguishability of identical particles , 2010, 1012.4111.

[2]  Ariel Caticha,et al.  Yet another resolution of the Gibbs paradox: an information theory approach , 2002 .

[3]  P. Ehrenfest Deduction of the dissociation-equilibrium from the theory of quanta and a calculation of the chemical constant based on this , 2022 .

[4]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  A Contextual Approach to Scientific Understanding , 2005, Synthese.

[5]  S. Saunders On the Emergence of Individuals in Physics , 2015 .

[6]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  The Logic of Identity: Distinguishability and Indistinguishability in Classical and Quantum Physics , 2014, 1405.3280.

[7]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  Is There a Unique Physical Entropy? Micro versus Macro , 2012, 1209.1025.

[8]  Robert H. Swendsen Unnormalized probability: A different view of statistical mechanics , 2014 .

[9]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  Another look at the quantum mechanical entropy of mixing , 1988 .

[10]  J. Ladyman,et al.  Entanglement and non-factorizability , 2013 .

[11]  Hagit Attiya,et al.  Indistinguishability , 2020, Commun. ACM.

[12]  E. Jaynes The Gibbs Paradox , 1992 .

[13]  Maria Carla Galavotti,et al.  The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective , 2009 .

[14]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  How Classical Particles Emerge From the Quantum World , 2010, 1002.2544.

[15]  Olivier Darrigol,et al.  The Gibbs Paradox: Early History and Solutions , 2018, Entropy.

[16]  Robert H. Swendsen,et al.  The definition of the thermodynamic entropy in statistical mechanics , 2016, 1605.05690.

[17]  H A R O L D,et al.  The Many Faces of Entropy* , 2022 .

[18]  Robert H. Swendsen,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Classical Systems with Distinguishable Particles , 2002 .

[19]  S. Strauss The Oxford Handbook Of Philosophy Of Physics , 2016 .

[20]  Robert H. Swendsen,et al.  Probability, Entropy, and Gibbs’ Paradox(es) , 2018, Entropy.

[21]  D. Dieks The Gibbs Paradox Revisited , 2010, 1003.0179.