One-year prospective three-center study comparing the outcome of a "soft bone implant" (prototype Mk IV) and the standard Brånemark implant.

BACKGROUND Oral implant treatment ad modum Brånemark has been used for decades in the rehabilitation of edentate and partially dentate patients. Posterior jaw regions frequently exhibit bone of poor texture, and it is often difficult to obtain primary stability. Thus, it may prove beneficial to deviate from the original protocol and to use implants with a modified design, for example, with a slightly tapered geometry. PURPOSE The purpose of the investigation was to compare the early behavior of a modified (prototype Mk IV, Brånemark System, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden; test) implant with that of the standard Brånemark implant (control) in regions of mainly type 4 bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three Swedish centers participated, and a total of 44 patients were treated with oral implants for 39 maxillas and 5 mandibles. The study focused on the most distal right and left implant sites (88 implants), which were randomized to receive either a test or a control implant. Various parameters were recorded, such as registered insertion torque (OsseoCare), Nobel Biocare AB), wobbling during insertion, primary and secondary stability (as measured with resonance frequency), and marginal bone loss. The implants were followed up for 1 year. RESULTS The test implant more frequently required a higher insertion torque and showed a significantly higher primary stability than the control implant. This difference in stability leveled out over time, and test and control implants exhibited similar secondary stability at abutment operation and at the 1-year visit. Wobbling during insertion was rarely recorded for either of the implant designs. The 1-year cumulative success rate was 93.1% for test implants and 88.4% for control implants. CONCLUSIONS The modified implant design resulted in an increased primary stability, which may be important when placing implants in jaw regions of type 4 bone. However, independent of the achieved primary stability, successful implants tended to approach similar secondary stability in the two designs tested.

[1]  L Sennerby,et al.  A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. , 1999, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  B Friberg,et al.  MkII--a modified self-tapping Brånemark implant: 3-year results of a controlled prospective pilot study. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[3]  G A Favero,et al.  Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  U. Lekholm,et al.  A new self-tapping Brånemark implant: clinical and radiographic evaluation. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  T Jemt,et al.  Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw. , 1999, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[6]  L Sennerby,et al.  Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  B. Friberg,et al.  Mk II: the self-tapping Brånemark implant: 5-year results of a prospective 3-center study. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  G Zarb,et al.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. , 1986, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  N Meredith,et al.  Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  L Sennerby,et al.  On cutting torque measurements during implant placement: a 3-year clinical prospective study. , 1999, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[11]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[12]  L Sennerby,et al.  Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. , 2000, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.