Using Assistive Technology Adaptations to Include Students with Learning Disabilities in Cooperative Learning Activities

Cooperative learning (CD is a common instructional arrangement that is used by classroom teachers to foster academic achievement and social acceptance of students with and without learning disabilities. Cooperative learning is appealing to classroom teachers because it can provide an opportunity for more instruction and feedback by peers than can be provided by teachers to individual students who require extra assistance. Recent studies suggest that students with LD may need adaptations during cooperative learning activities. The use of assistive technology adaptations may be necessary to help some students with LD compensate for their specific learning difficulties so that they can engage more readily in cooperative learning activities. A process for integrating technology adaptations into cooperative learning activities is discussed in terms of three components: selecting adaptations, monitoring the use of the adaptations during cooperative learning activities, and evaluating the adaptations' effectiveness. The article concludes with comments regarding barriers to and support systems for technology integration, technology and effective instructional practices, and the need to consider technology adaptations for students who have learning disabilities.

[1]  Steven F. Roth,et al.  Theoretical and Instructional Implications of the Assessment of Two Microcomputer Word Recognition Programs. , 1987 .

[2]  Marion V. Panyan,et al.  The Integration of Technology in the Curriculum , 1988 .

[3]  Assistive Technology for Students with Mild Disabilities , 1994 .

[4]  D. Deshler,et al.  Learning Strategies: An Instructional Alternative for Low-Achieving Adolescents , 1986, Exceptional children.

[5]  Different Cooperative Learning Procedures and Cross-Handicap Relationships , 1986, Exceptional children.

[6]  Randall B. Boone,et al.  Hypertext Support for Remedial Students and Students with Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[7]  R. Y. Nishimi,et al.  From the Office of Technology Assessment. , 1993, JAMA.

[8]  J. Torgesen.  The Role of Nonspecific Factors in the Task Performance of Learning Disabled Children , 1977 .

[9]  M. Cosden,et al.  The Effects of Cooperative and Individual Goal Structures on Learning Disabled and Nondisabled Students , 1985, Exceptional children.

[10]  S. Vaughn,et al.  General Education Teachers' Beliefs, Skills, and Practices in Planning for Mainstreamed Students with Learning Disabilities , 1994 .

[11]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  A Model for Writing Instruction: Integrating Word Processing and Strategy Instruction into a Process Approach to Writing. , 1991 .

[12]  James A. Siders,et al.  Intelligibility of computer synthesized speech among mildly handicapped and nonhandicapped youth , 1986 .

[13]  Maria Yau.  Lap Top Computers and the Learning Disabled Student. A Study of the Value of Portable Computers to the Writing Progress of Students with Fine Motor Problems. No. 193. , 1990 .

[14]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Using Technology to Enhance the Writing Processes of Students with Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[15]  Len Scrogan.  The OTA Report: New Technologies Are Making a Difference. , 1988 .

[16]  K. Sheingold,et al.  Restructuring for Learning with Technology: The Potential for Synergy. , 1991 .

[17]  Christopher M. Moersch.  Levels of Technology Implementation (LoTi): A Framework for Measuring Classroom Technology Use. , 1995 .

[18]  Penny Reed,et al.  Education TECH Points for Assistive Technology Planning , 1995 .

[19]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Cooperative Learning as an Inclusion Strategy: A Closer Look , 1996 .

[20]  Susan T. Koscinski,et al.  Computer-Assisted Instruction with Constant Time Delay to Teach Multiplication Facts to Students with Learning Disabilities. , 1993 .

[21]  Assisting Students with Difficult Textbooks: Teacher Perceptions and Practices. , 1994 .

[22]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech , 1986 .

[23]  Tom V. Hanley,et al.  Technological Innovation in the Context of Special Education Systems: A Qualitative and Structured Research Approach , 1988 .

[24]  Mark A. Horney,et al.  Computer-Based Study Strategies For Students With Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[25]  Philippa H. Campbell,et al.  Technology For Persons with Severe Disabilities , 1987 .

[26]  P. Gregory,et al.  February , 1890, The Hospital.

[27]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Reading Effects of IBM’s “Writing to Read” Program: A Review of Evaluations , 1991 .

[28]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Learning Handicapped Students' Interactions during a Microcomputer-Based Group Writing Activity , 1990 .

[29]  C. Evertson,et al.  Variables Related to the Effective Instruction of Difficult-to-Teach Children. , 1988 .

[30]  Gail McGregor,et al.  Assistive Technology in Schools: Are Teachers Ready, Able, and Supported? , 1996 .

[31]  B. Chiang.  Initial Learning and Transfer Effects of Microcomputer Drills on LD Students' Multiplication Skills , 1986 .

[32]  C. MacArthur,et al.  The Impact of Computers on the Writing Process , 1988, Exceptional children.

[33]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effects of team assisted individualization on the mathematics achievement of academically handicapped and nonhandicapped students , 1984 .

[34]  John Woodward,et al.  Uses of Technology for Mathematics Assessment and Instruction: Reflection on a Decade of Innovations , 1993 .

[35]  S. Sharan.  Cooperative Learning in Small Groups: Recent Methods and Effects on Achievement, Attitudes, and Ethnic Relations , 1980 .

[36]  Sharon Glennen,et al.  The Handbook of Assistive Technology , 1991 .

[37]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  A Peer Editor Strategy: Guiding Learning-Disabled Students in Response and Revision , 1993, Research in the Teaching of English.

[38]  R T Johnson,et al.  Mainstreaming and Cooperative Learning Strategies , 1986, Exceptional children.

[39]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Computer Speech and the Remediation of Reading and Spelling Problems , 1994 .

[40]  L. Goodfellow,et al.  Cooperative Learning Strategies , 1995 .

[41]  Carl Brown,et al.  Computer Access in Higher Education for Students with Disabilities , 1989 .

[42]  V. Brown.  Reading Instruction , 1967 .

[43]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Student Assistant for Learning from Text (SALT) , 1995, Journal of learning disabilities.

[44]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  Assistive Technology for Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1998, Journal of learning disabilities.

[45]  Diane Pedrotty Rivera,et al.  Teaching Students With Learning and Behavior Problems , 1988 .

[46]  John Woodward,et al.  Virtual Reality and Its Potential Use in Special Education. Identifying Emerging Issues and Trends in Technology for Special Education. , 1992 .

[47]  Victor H. P. van Daal,et al.  Effects of independent word practice with segmented and whole‐word sound feedback in disabled readers , 1990 .

[48]  David W. Johnson.  The New Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom and School , 1994 .

[49]  B. Pentland.  Living in a State of Stuck: How technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[50]  J. Brophy.  Teacher behavior and student achievement , 1984 .

[51]  H. Swanson.  Strategy Instruction: Overview of Principles and Procedures for Effective Use , 1989 .

[52]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Goal Structures and Performance Contingencies on the Math Performance of Adolescents with Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[53]  D. Deshler,et al.  Setting demand variables: a major factor in program planning for the LD adolescent , 1984 .

[54]  Edythe Johnson Holubec,et al.  Cooperation in the Classroom , 1993 .

[55]  R. Wilburn Clouse,et al.  Three Approaches to Teaching Reading: Basal, Language Experience, and Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1994 .