Issues of Representation in Psycholinguistics

This chapter discusses the need for explicit, well-motivated linguistic representations in psycholinguistics, highlighting the possibility that much of the predictive and explanatory work of psycholinguistic theories may derive from the properties of these representations and from the vocabulary and constraints needed to generate or describe them. Natural classes of representations offer the rationale for the particular way the language processor is modularized, determining the overall architecture of the system and the relation between subsystems. On this approach, it is essentially the representations that define the tasks of language comprehension and regulate the interplay between subsystems. The chapter discusses several open issues that confront the representational approach to language processing and examines the area of syntax and semantics. Under this, it illustrates the dependence of processing hypotheses on the linguistic representations assigned to particular sentences. It also takes a look at the issues of precompilation, describing the mental representation of the grammar, that is, at the format in which humans store the grammatical knowledge that permits a well-formed representation to be assigned to a (novel) word, phrase, or sentence. Finally, the chapter states tha topen questions remain concerning what aspects of structure or meaning must obligatorily be specified within each subsystem or representation type of linguistics.

[1]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Linear order in phonological representation , 1989 .

[2]  L. Frazier,et al.  Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch , 1989 .

[3]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  M. Taft Lexical processing of functionally constrained words , 1990 .

[5]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser , 1989 .

[6]  Noam Chomsky Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures , 1993 .

[7]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The acquisition of syntactic knowledge , 1985 .

[8]  J. da SwinneyNicol,et al.  The time course of co-indexation during sentence comprehension , 1987 .

[9]  H E Wanner,et al.  An ATN approach to comprehension , 1978 .

[10]  Hagit Borer,et al.  The Maturation of Syntax , 1987 .

[11]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.

[12]  Jonathan Edward Mitchell,et al.  THE FORMAL SEMANTICS OF POINT OF VIEW , 1986 .

[13]  W. Levelt Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[14]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Empty categories in sentence processing , 1989 .

[15]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[16]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  Modularity and the processing of closed-class words , 1993 .

[17]  Rita M. Manzini,et al.  Parameters, binding theory and learnability , 1987 .

[18]  Marica de Vincenzi,et al.  Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian , 1991 .

[19]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Thematic roles and language comprehension , 1988 .

[20]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Natural language parsing: Do listeners compute linguistic representations? , 1985 .

[21]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  D-Theory: Talking about Talking about Trees , 1983, ACL.

[22]  Gabriella Hermon,et al.  Extraposition and the complement principle , 1990 .

[23]  Sylvain Bromberger Why phonology is different , 1989 .

[24]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Sentence matching and overgeneration , 1987, Cognition.

[25]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon , 1991, Cognition.

[26]  C. Clifton,et al.  Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies , 1989 .

[27]  M. L. Millis,et al.  The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don’t , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Lyn Frazier The mapping between grammar and processor , 1986 .

[29]  A. R. Schmauder Grammatical and conceptual features in the mental lexicon : processing in isolation and in context. , 1992 .

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[31]  J. Nicol Coreference processing during sentence comprehension , 1988 .

[32]  T. Bever,et al.  Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension , 1988 .

[33]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Wh-Movement , 1977 .

[34]  Gerry T. M. Altmann,et al.  Parsing and interpretation: An introduction , 1989 .

[35]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Conditions on transformations , 1971 .

[36]  Ken Wexler,et al.  On Unparsable Input in Language Acquisition , 1990 .

[37]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[38]  K. Forster,et al.  The psychological status of overgenerated sentences , 1985, Cognition.

[39]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch , 1987 .

[40]  Nina Hyams,et al.  Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters , 1986 .