Impact of Dominance and Relatedness on Brand Extensions

This research investigated how a consumer's cognitive structure for a brand in a given product category affects the possible transfer of associations to other product categories. One key factor in evaluating such possible brand extensions is dominance , which can be defined as the strength of the directional association between the parent category and the branded product. Likewise, another important factor is the relatedness of the brand's parent category and the target category of the proposed extension. The 1st experiment measured dominance and relatedness via response latencies to recognize brand extensions. The 2nd experiment demonstrated that consumers’ affect for strongly category-dominant brands (a) transfers better to an extension when the proposed extension is closely rather than distantly related to the parent category and (b) transfers better than a weakly category-dominant brand's affect. Together, the research demonstrated that consumers’ response times to disconfirm the existence of product-brand pairs is related to their transfer of affect from the brand to the proposed product category. This disconfirmation method could be used as an unobtrusive measure for determining brand boundaries. The attractiveness of potential brand extensions may thus be determined without consumers making any judgments about a proposed extension other than answering whether or not it exists.

[1]  David A. Aaker,et al.  Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising's Role in Building Strong Brands , 1994 .

[2]  L. Rips,et al.  Categories and resemblance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact? , 1993 .

[4]  D. Gentner,et al.  Respects for similarity , 1993 .

[5]  Kevin Lane Keller Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[6]  Jeffrey R. Williams,et al.  How Sustainable is Your Competitive Advantage? , 1992 .

[7]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Contextualized representations of brand extensions: Are feature lists or frames the basic components of consumer cognition? , 1992 .

[8]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions , 1992 .

[9]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency , 1991 .

[10]  David M. Boush,et al.  A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation , 1991 .

[11]  P. Nedungadi Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations , 1990 .

[12]  B. Loken,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality , 1990 .

[13]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[14]  Carol J. Williams,et al.  The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process , 1989 .

[15]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage , 1989 .

[16]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  The influence of unique features and direction of comparison of preferences , 1989 .

[17]  Jack Trout,et al.  Bottom-Up Marketing , 1988 .

[18]  P. Herr,et al.  Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. , 1986 .

[19]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management , 1986 .

[20]  David M. Sanbonmatsu,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  L. Barsalou Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[23]  P. Herr,et al.  On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects , 1983 .

[24]  John R. Anderson A spreading activation theory of memory. , 1983 .

[25]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Ad hoc categories , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[26]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction. , 1981 .

[27]  Edward M. Tauber,et al.  Brand franchise extension: New product benefits from existing Brand Names , 1981 .

[28]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Concepts, propositions, and schemata: what are the cognitive units? , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[29]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[30]  M. Ashcraft Property dominance and typicality effects in property statement verification , 1978 .

[31]  B. Hayes-Roth Evolution of Cognitive Structures and Processes. , 1977 .

[32]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[33]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. , 1974 .

[34]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[35]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[36]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  The effects of direct and associative brand extension strategies on consumer response to brand , 1993 .

[37]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Managing Brand Equity , 1991 .

[38]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. , 1990 .

[39]  Peter H. Farquhar,et al.  A Relational Model For Category Extensions of Brands , 1990 .

[40]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Determining the competitive structure of product-markets : practices, issues, and suggestions , 1990 .

[41]  Deborah J. MacInnis,et al.  Product Category Perceptions, Elaborative Processing and Brand Name Extension Strategies , 1990 .

[42]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Memory Structure of Brand Names , 1989 .

[43]  P. Farquhar MANAGING BRAND EQUITY , 1989 .

[44]  E. Tauber,et al.  BRAND LEVERAGE: STRATEGY FOR GROWTH IN A COST-CONTROL WORLD , 1988 .

[45]  B. Loken,et al.  The Generality of Typicality Effects on Preference and Comparison: an Exploratory Test , 1988 .

[46]  J. Wesley Hutchinson,et al.  The Prototypicality of Brands: Relationships With Brand Awareness, Preference and Usage , 1985 .

[47]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[48]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Concepts and concept formation. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.

[49]  M. Zanna,et al.  Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1981 .

[50]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[51]  Jack Trout,et al.  Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind , 1981 .

[52]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Studies of similarity , 1978 .

[53]  E. Loftus Category dominance, instance dominance, and categorization time. , 1973 .