The salience and complexity of building, regulating, and governing the smart grid: Lessons from a statewide public–private partnership☆

Smart grid deployment unfolds within a diverse array of multi-institutional arrangements that may be too fragmented and decentralized to allow for the kind of large-scale and coordinated investments needed to properly deploy the smart grid. This case study provides an account of how one state arranged for and eventually deployed smart grid technology to over 85 percent of its resident. The study asks: does the deployment of the smart grid introduce new socio-political variables into the electricity distribution industry? To make sense of the socio-political variables shaping the industry and regulators, the Salience–Complexity Model is used to assess whether the smart grid raises or lowers the level of public scrutiny caste upon the industry (issue salience) and the level of technical capacity needed to execute and utilize the smart grid (technical complexity). The conclusions to be drawn from this study include: smart grid technology heightens the issue salience and the technical complexity of electricity distribution, but that the smart grid will likely not have a significant impact on the restructuring of electricity regulation.

[1]  Brian J. Gerber,et al.  Regulatory Policymaking in the American States: A Review of Theories and Evidence , 2000 .

[2]  Alexander L. Davis,et al.  Preparing for smart grid technologies: A behavioral decision research approach to understanding consumer expectations about smart meters , 2012 .

[3]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Socio-Political Evaluation of Energy Deployment (SPEED): An integrated research framework analyzing energy technology deployment , 2008 .

[4]  John W. Kingdon Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[5]  J. Ekanayake,et al.  The Smart Grid , 2012 .

[6]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[7]  Kenneth J. Meier,et al.  The Politics of Insurance Regulation , 1991 .

[8]  Clinton J. Andrews Diffusion Pathways for Electricity Deregulation , 2000 .

[9]  G. A. Dhomane,et al.  Smart Grid , 2021, Virtual Power Plant System Integration Technology.

[10]  M. McHenry Technical and governance considerations for advanced metering infrastructure/smart meters: Technology, security, uncertainty, costs, benefits, and risks , 2013 .

[11]  W. Gormley Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System , 1986, Polity.

[12]  R. Rhodes Understanding governance : policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability , 1997 .

[13]  Sangjoon Ka,et al.  Ideology and Professionalism , 2002 .

[14]  Per J. Agrell,et al.  Smart-grid Investments, Regulation and Organization , 2013 .

[15]  G. Fulli,et al.  A business case for Smart Grid technologies: A systemic perspective , 2011 .

[16]  M. Crenson,et al.  Downsizing Democracy: How America Sidelined Its Citizens and Privatized Its Public , 2002 .