Evaluation of a dynamic arm support for seated and standing tasks: a laboratory study of electromyography and subjective feedback

The goal of this study was to determine whether a new dynamic arm support system reduced shoulder and arm muscle load for seated and standing hand/arm tasks. The new system provides support for both horizontal and vertical arm motion. A total of 11 participants performed ten tasks (five seated and five standing) both with and without the arm support. Outcomes were assessed with electromyography and subjective feedback. Muscle activity was measured over the dominant side supraspinatus, triceps and forearm extensor muscles. Significant (p < 0.01) reductions in static muscle activity were observed in one of ten tasks performed with the support device for the supraspinatus muscle, in five tasks for the triceps and in one task for forearm extensor muscles. Likewise, a significant improvement in subjective measures was reported with the support device for ‘ease of task’ for two of ten tasks, for ‘forearm comfort’ for three of ten tasks and for ‘shoulder effort’ for six of ten tasks. The results suggest that a dynamic forearm support may improve subjective comfort and reduce static muscle loads in the upper extremity for tasks that involve horizontal movement of the arms. For rapid motions, the value of the support is limited due to internal inertia and friction.

[1]  J Ekholm,et al.  Effects of arm support or suspension on neck and shoulder muscle activity during sedentary work. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  U. Arborelius,et al.  Effects of arm support on shoulder and arm muscle activity during sedentary work. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[3]  O. Hänninen,et al.  Shoulder strain in keyboard workers and its alleviation by arm supports , 1988, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[4]  Fredric Gerr,et al.  A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[5]  V Louhevaara,et al.  Effects of Ergorest® Arm Supports on Muscle Strain and Wrist Positions During the Use of the Mouse and Keyboard in Work With Visual Display Units: A Work Site Intervention , 2001, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[6]  E. Tichauer Anatomic Guide for the Electromyographer , 1977 .

[7]  U P Arborelius,et al.  Effects of arm suspension in simulated assembly line work: muscular activity and posture angles. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  M Tepper,et al.  The effect of an ergonomic computer device on muscle activity of the upper trapezius muscle during typing. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Kaj Bo Veiersted,et al.  Sustained muscle tension as a risk factor for trapezius myalgia , 1994 .

[10]  R Kadefors,et al.  The effect of arm support on supraspinatus muscle load during simulated assembly work and welding. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[11]  M. Hagberg,et al.  The amplitude distribution of the myoelectric signal in an ergonomic study of the deltoid muscle. , 1975, Ergonomics.

[12]  B. Visser,et al.  The effect of arm and wrist supports on the load of the upper extremity during VDU work. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  A Aarås,et al.  Postural load during VDU work: a comparison between various work postures. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[14]  M. Coye,et al.  NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL AND INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE , 1998 .