Visuospatial priming of the mental number line

It has been argued that numbers are spatially organized along a "mental number line" that facilitates left-hand responses to small numbers, and right-hand responses to large numbers. We hypothesized that whenever the representations of visual and numerical space are concurrently activated, interactions can occur between them, before response selection. A spatial prime is processed faster than a numerical target, and consistent with our hypothesis, we found that such a spatial prime affects non-spatial, verbal responses more when the prime follows a numerical target (backward priming) then when it precedes it (forward priming). This finding emerged both in a number-comparison and a parity judgment task, and cannot be ascribed to a "Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes" (SNARC). Contrary to some earlier claims, we therefore conclude that visuospatial-numerical interactions do occur, even before response selection.

[1]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  D. W. Ricker,et al.  Spatial Representation , 2021, Problem Solving in Mathematics and Beyond.

[3]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[4]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[5]  W Fias,et al.  Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect , 2001, Psychological research.

[6]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[7]  B. Hommel,et al.  Backward-compatibility effects with irrelevant stimulus-response overlap: the case of the SNARC effect. , 2004, The Journal of general psychology.

[8]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Axon growth inhibition: signals from the p75 neurotrophin receptor , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Miller,et al.  A warning about median reaction time. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[13]  M. Zorzi,et al.  A computational model of the Simon effect , 1995, Psychological research.

[14]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglect , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The number line effect reflects top-down control , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[19]  A. Antebi,et al.  Long Life A Matter of Taste (and Smell) , 2004, Neuron.

[20]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[21]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Paola Guariglia,et al.  Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Methods for Dealing With Reaction Time Outliers , 1992 .

[25]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  An algorithm for determining the endpoints of isolated utterances , 1975, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[26]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[27]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[28]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Explicit versus Implicit Processing of Representational Space in Neglect: Dissociations in Accessing the Mental Number Line , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Chris J. James A vocal response time system for use with sentence verification tasks , 1996 .