Comparison of sound propagation and perception of three types of backup alarms with regards to worker safety.

A technology of backup alarms based on the use of a broadband signal has recently gained popularity in many countries. In this study, the performance of this broadband technology is compared to that of a conventional tonal alarm and a multi-tone alarm from a worker-safety standpoint. Field measurements of sound pressure level patterns behind heavy vehicles were performed in real work environments and psychoacoustic measurements (sound detection thresholds, equal loudness, perceived urgency and sound localization) were carried out in the laboratory with human subjects. Compared with the conventional tonal alarm, the broadband alarm generates a much more uniform sound field behind vehicles, is easier to localize in space and is judged slighter louder at representative alarm levels. Slight advantages were found with the tonal alarm for sound detection and for perceived urgency at low levels, but these benefits observed in laboratory conditions would not overcome the detrimental effects associated with the large and abrupt variations in sound pressure levels (up to 15-20 dB within short distances) observed in the field behind vehicles for this alarm, which are significantly higher than those obtained with the broadband alarm. Performance with the multi-tone alarm generally fell between that of the tonal and broadband alarms on most measures.

[1]  Joseph Sataloff,et al.  Hearing Protection Devices , 2006 .

[2]  K. D. Kryter.  Effects of Ear Protective Devices on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise , 1946 .

[3]  John G. Casali,et al.  Do Amplitude-Sensitive Hearing Protectors Improve Detectability of Vehicle Backup Alarms in Noise? , 1995 .

[4]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  Research on Modelling the Effects of Personal Hearing Protection and Communications Devices on Speech Intelligibility in Noise , 2011 .

[5]  A. M. Martin,et al.  An investigation of the effects of hearing protectors on vocal communication in noise , 1975 .

[6]  B. Scharf,et al.  Binaural summation of loudness: reconsidered. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  M. Rauf Ahmad,et al.  Analysis of high-dimensional repeated measures designs: The one sample case , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[8]  A. King,et al.  From outer ear to virtual space , 1993, Current Biology.

[9]  SirensDeborah J. Withington.  The Quest for Better Ambulance , 1996 .

[10]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  A Psychoacoustical Model for Specifying the Level and Spectrum of Acoustic Warning Signals in the Workplace , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  William M. Hartmann,et al.  How we localize sound , 1999 .

[12]  W Noble,et al.  The effect of various hearing protectors on sound localization in the horizontal and vertical planes. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[13]  D J Withington.  REVERSING GOES BROADBAND , 2004 .

[14]  M. Srivastava.  Some Tests Concerning the Covariance Matrix in High Dimensional Data , 2005 .

[15]  Jarkko Honkonen,et al.  The alarm system , 2005 .

[16]  J P Bliss,et al.  Human probability matching behaviour in response to alarms of varying reliability. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[17]  Deborah Withington.  The Use of Directional Sound to Improve the Safety of Auditory Warnings , 2000 .

[18]  J Edworthy,et al.  A user-centred approach to the design and evaluation of auditory warning signals: 1. Methodology. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[19]  Robert S. Bolia,et al.  Effects of Hearing Protectors on Auditory Localization in Azimuth and Elevation , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  Evaluation of auditory functions for Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[21]  A H Suter.  Communication and job performance in noise: a review. , 1992, ASHA monographs.

[22]  G. R. C. Atherley,et al.  Effect of Ear Defenders (Ear-Muffs) on the Localization of Sound , 1971 .

[23]  J. R. Comstock,et al.  A psychophysiological evaluation of the perceived urgency of auditory warning signals. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[24]  Richard L. McKinley,et al.  The Impact of Hearing Protection on Sound Localization and Orienting Behavior , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[25]  J G Casali,et al.  Audibility of reverse alarms under hearing protectors for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[26]  W G Noble,et al.  Theoretical and practical implications of the effects of hearing protection devices on localization ability. , 1972, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[27]  J Edworthy,et al.  Improving Auditory Warning Design: Relationship between Warning Sound Parameters and Perceived Urgency , 1991, Human factors.

[28]  Genevieve M. Heckman,et al.  Auditory Localization of Backup Alarms: The Effects of Alarm Mounting Location , 2011 .

[29]  G. Box.  NON-NORMALITY AND TESTS ON VARIANCES , 1953 .

[30]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Two-dimensional sound localization by human listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Peter E Keller,et al.  Auditory warnings, signal-referent relations, and natural indicators: re-thinking theory and application. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[32]  Erika Christian,et al.  The Detection of Warning Signals While Wearing Active Noise Reduction and Passive Hearing Protection Devices , 1999 .

[33]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sound localization by human listeners. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  John G Casali,et al.  The challenge of localizing vehicle backup alarms: effects of passive and electronic hearing protectors, ambient noise level, and backup alarm spectral content. , 2011, Noise & health.

[35]  Anne Guillaume,et al.  Judging the urgency of nonvocal auditory warning signals: perceptual and cognitive processes. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[37]  Judy Edworthy,et al.  Quantifying the perceived urgency of auditory warnings , 1989 .

[38]  Noble Wg.  Earmuffs, exploratory head movements, and horizontal and vertical sound localization. , 1981 .

[39]  Robert A. Butler,et al.  The bandwidth effect on monaural and binaural localization , 1986, Hearing Research.

[40]  Mariea C. Dunn,et al.  Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload , 2000, Ergonomics.

[41]  Gary S. Robinson,et al.  Effect of Electronic ANR and Conventional Hearing Protectors on Vehicle Backup Alarm Detection in Noise , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[42]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  Determination of optimal acoustic features for reverse alarms : field measurements and the design of a sound propagation model , 1998 .

[43]  S. Abel,et al.  Sound localization. The interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.

[44]  Lovejoy Muchenje,et al.  Determination of Backup Alarm Masked Threshold in Construction Noise , 2008 .

[45]  Ken R Catchpole,et al.  Localizable auditory warning pulses , 2004, Ergonomics.

[46]  J. Blauert.  Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[47]  Khaled Ahmed Alali,et al.  Azimuthal Localization and Detection of Vehicular Backup Alarms Under Electronic and Non-Electronic Hearing Protection Devices in Noisy and Quiet Environments , 2011 .

[48]  E C Haas,et al.  Perceived urgency of and response time to multi-tone and frequency-modulated warning signals in broadband noise. , 1995, Ergonomics.