Funding shapes the anatomy of scientific research

Research projects are primarily collaborative in nature through internal and external partnerships, but what role does funding play in their formation? Here, we examined over 43,000 funded projects in the past three decades, enabling us to characterise changes in the funding landscape and their impacts on the underlying collaboration patterns. We observed rising inequality in the distribution of funding and its effect was most noticeable at the institutional level in which the leading universities diversified their collaborations and increasingly became the knowledge brokers. Furthermore, these universities formed a cohesive core through their close ties, and such reliance appeared to be a key for their research success, with the elites in the core over-attracting resources but in turn rewarding in both research breadth and depth. Our results reveal how collaboration networks undergo previously unknown adaptive organisation in response to external driving forces, which can have far-reaching implications for future policy.

[1]  Vito Latora,et al.  Social Cohesion, Structural Holes, and a Tale of Two Measures , 2012, ArXiv.

[2]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[3]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.

[4]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[6]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Social Dynamics of Science , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Ling-Yun Wu,et al.  Structure and dynamics of core/periphery networks , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[8]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Daniel B. Larremore,et al.  Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks , 2015, Science Advances.

[10]  Athen Ma,et al.  Rich-Cores in Networks , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  C. Simkin. About Economic Inequality , 1998 .

[12]  M. Newman 1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .

[13]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .

[14]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[15]  D. Watts,et al.  Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Sheila Wilson,et al.  Research Excellence Framework , 2013 .

[17]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[18]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research , 2005 .

[19]  J. Hirsch Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Detecting rich-club ordering in complex networks , 2006, physics/0602134.

[21]  Benjamin F. Jones The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[22]  Jerrold W. Grossman,et al.  A portion of the well-known collaboration graph , 1995 .

[23]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[24]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Shi Zhou,et al.  The rich-club phenomenon in the Internet topology , 2003, IEEE Communications Letters.

[26]  Giulio Cimini,et al.  The Scientific Competitiveness of Nations , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[28]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[29]  J. Moody The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[30]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Vincent D. Blondel,et al.  Career on the Move: Geography, Stratification, and Scientific Impact , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[32]  David J. Currie,et al.  Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding , 2013, PloS one.