Comparative short-term in vitro analysis of mutans streptococci adhesion on esthetic, nickel-titanium, and stainless-steel arch wires.

OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that there are no differences in mutans streptococci (MS) adhesion between esthetic and metallic orthodontic arch wires based on their surface characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS Surface roughness (Ra) and apparent surface free energy (SFE) were measured for six wires-four esthetic, one nickel-titanium (NiTi), and one stainless-steel (SS)-using profilometry and dynamic contact angle analysis, respectively. The amount of MS (Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus) adhering to the wires was quantified using the colony-counting method. The surfaces, coating layers, and MS adhesion were also observed by scanning electron microscopy. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS The Ra values of the esthetic wires were significantly different from one another depending on the coating method (P < .05). The NiTi wire showed the highest SFE, followed by the SS wire and then the four esthetic wires. The NiTi wires produced a significantly higher MS adhesion than did the SS wires (P < .05). The esthetic wires showed significantly lower MS adhesions than did the NiTi wire (P < .05). Pearson correlation analyses found moderate significant positive correlations between the SFE and the S mutans and S sobrinus adhesions (r  =  .636/.427, P < .001/P  =  .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The hypothesis is rejected. This study indicates that some esthetic coatings on NiTi alloy might reduce MS adhesion in vitro in the short term.

[1]  G. Rahilly,et al.  Current Products and Practice , 2014 .

[2]  Y. K. Kim,et al.  Influence of surface energy parameters of dental self-adhesive resin cements on bond strength to dentin , 2013 .

[3]  M. Mirjalili,et al.  Comparative study on corrosion behaviour of Nitinol and stainless steel orthodontic wires in simulated saliva solution in presence of fluoride ions. , 2013, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[4]  K. Kim,et al.  Influence of surface characteristics on the adhesion of Candida albicans to various denture lining materials. , 2013, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[5]  Amit Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Characterization of biomaterials , 2013 .

[6]  H. Choe,et al.  Effect of coating on properties of esthetic orthodontic nickel-titanium wires. , 2012, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  Sergio Paduano,et al.  Evaluation of surface roughness of orthodontic wires by means of atomic force microscopy. , 2012, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  L. Scheideler,et al.  Wetting behavior of dental implants. , 2011, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  K. Kim,et al.  Effect of garlic on bacterial biofilm formation on orthodontic wire. , 2011, The Angle orthodontist.

[11]  B. Lim,et al.  Effect of orthodontic bonding steps on the initial adhesion of mutans streptococci in the presence of saliva. , 2011, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  R Schwestka-Polly,et al.  Reduction of biofilm on orthodontic brackets with the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene coating. , 2010, European journal of orthodontics.

[13]  I. Moppett Letter to the Editor: New Equations for Predicting Postoperative Risk in Patients with Hip Fracture , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  Y. K. Kim,et al.  Antibacterial effects of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin containing chlorhexidine. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[15]  S. Fan,et al.  Letter to the Editor: New Equations for Predicting Postoperative Risk in Patients with Hip Fracture , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  B. Lim,et al.  Surface characteristics of orthodontic materials and their effects on adhesion of mutans streptococci. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[17]  W. Schneider-Brachert,et al.  Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  D. Bearn,et al.  Ex vivo surface and mechanical properties of coated orthodontic archwires. , 2008, European journal of orthodontics.

[19]  K. Kim,et al.  Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[20]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[21]  C. Kao,et al.  Cytotoxicity of orthodontic wire corroded in fluoride solution in vitro. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[22]  G. Rahilly,et al.  Nickel Allergy and Orthodontics , 2003, Journal of orthodontics.

[23]  C. Ziegler,et al.  Adsorption/desorption phenomena on pure and Teflon AF-coated titania surfaces studied by dynamic contact angle analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  Tohru Imaia,et al.  Effects of water immersion on mechanical properties of new esthetic orthodontic wire. , 1999 .

[25]  M. Kobayashi,et al.  Effects of water immersion on mechanical properties of new esthetic orthodontic wire. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  M. Quirynen,et al.  The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[27]  Buddy D. Ratner,et al.  Chapter 8 Characterization of biomaterial surfaces , 1993 .

[28]  Buddy D. Ratner,et al.  Characterization of Biomaterial Surfaces , 1993 .

[29]  Henk J. Busscher,et al.  The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angles of liquids , 1984 .