Connected or informed?: Local Twitter networking in a London neighbourhood

This paper asks whether geographically localised, or ‘hyperlocal’, uses of Twitter succeed in creating peer-to-peer neighbourhood networks or simply act as broadcast media at a reduced scale. Literature drawn from the smart cities discourse and from a UK research project into hyperlocal media, respectively, take on these two opposing interpretations. Evidence gathered in the case study presented here is consistent with the latter, and on this basis we criticise the notion that hyperlocal social media can be seen as a community in itself. We demonstrate this by creating a network map of Twitter followers of a popular hyperlocal blog in Brockley, southeast London. We describe various attributes of this network including its average degree and clustering coefficient to suggest that a small and highly connected cluster of visible local entities such as businesses form a clique at the centre of this network, with individual residents following these but not one another. We then plot the locations of these entities and demonstrate that sub-communities in the network are formed due to close geographical proximity between smaller sets of businesses. These observations are illustrated with qualitative evidence from interviews with users who suggest instead that rather than being connected to one another they benefit from what has been described as ‘neighbourhood storytelling’. Despite the limitations of working with Twitter data, we propose that this multi-modal approach offers a valuable way to investigate the experience of using social media as a communication tool in urban neighbourhoods.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[2]  Steven Barnett,et al.  Plurality, Policy and the Local , 2015 .

[3]  Cecilia Loureiro-Koechlin,et al.  The Emergence of Converging Communities via Twitter , 2013, J. Community Informatics.

[4]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Geography of Twitter networks , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[5]  James Gatewood,et al.  The Connected City: How Networks are Shaping the Modern Metropolis , 2013 .

[6]  C. Avgerou The Informational City: Information Technology Economic Restructuring and the Urban Regional Process , 1991 .

[7]  D. Radcliffe,et al.  Here and Now: UK Hyperlocal Media Today , 2012 .

[8]  Emily T. Metzgar,et al.  Defining hyperlocal media: Proposing a framework for discussion , 2011, New Media Soc..

[9]  Gabrielle Durepos Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[10]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[11]  D. Harte,et al.  The state of UK hyperlocal community news: findings from a survey of practitioners , 2014 .

[12]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[13]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  Networked: The New Social Operating System , 2013, Int. J. E Politics.

[15]  S. Ball-Rokeach,et al.  Civic Engagement From a Communication Infrastructure Perspective , 2006 .

[16]  S. Matei,et al.  Storytelling Neighborhood Paths to Belonging in Diverse Urban Environments , 2001 .

[17]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Tracking "gross community happiness" from tweets , 2012, CSCW.

[18]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  The Social World of Twitter: Topics, Geography, and Emotions , 2012, ICWSM.

[19]  D. Harte,et al.  The state of hyperlocal community news in the UK: findings from a survey of practitioners , 2014 .