A mathematical model of mechanotransduction reveals how mechanical memory regulates mesenchymal stem cell fate decisions

BackgroundMechanical and biophysical properties of the cellular microenvironment regulate cell fate decisions. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) fate is influenced by past mechanical dosing (memory), but the mechanisms underlying this process have not yet been well defined. We have yet to understand how memory affects specific cell fate decisions, such as the differentiation of MSCs into neurons, adipocytes, myocytes, and osteoblasts.ResultsWe study a minimal gene regulatory network permissive of multi-lineage MSC differentiation into four cell fates. We present a continuous model that is able to describe the cell fate transitions that occur during differentiation, and analyze its dynamics with tools from multistability, bifurcation, and cell fate landscape analysis, and via stochastic simulation. Whereas experimentally, memory has only been observed during osteogenic differentiation, this model predicts that memory regions can exist for each of the four MSC-derived cell lineages. We can predict the substrate stiffness ranges over which memory drives differentiation; these are directly testable in an experimental setting. Furthermore, we quantitatively predict how substrate stiffness and culture duration co-regulate the fate of a stem cell, and we find that the feedbacks from the differentiating MSC onto its substrate are critical to preserve mechanical memory. Strikingly, we show that re-seeding MSCs onto a sufficiently soft substrate increases the number of cell fates accessible.ConclusionsControl of MSC differentiation is crucial for the success of much-lauded regenerative therapies based on MSCs. We have predicted new memory regions that will directly impact this control, and have quantified the size of the memory region for osteoblasts, as well as the co-regulatory effects on cell fates of substrate stiffness and culture duration. Taken together, these results can be used to develop novel strategies to better control the fates of MSCs in vitro and following transplantation.

[1]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  S. Thrun,et al.  Substrate Elasticity Regulates Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Culture , 2010, Science.

[3]  D. A. Baxter,et al.  Modeling transcriptional control in gene networks—methods, recent results, and future directions , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[4]  E. Allen.  Modeling with Itô Stochastic Differential Equations , 2007 .

[5]  Y. Kuznetsov,et al.  New features of the software MatCont for bifurcation analysis of dynamical systems , 2008 .

[6]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[7]  Heino Prinz,et al.  Hill coefficients, dose–response curves and allosteric mechanisms , 2010, Journal of chemical biology.

[8]  Sirio Dupont.  Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction , 2011 .

[9]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  Modeling Cell–Cell Interactions in Regulating Multiple Myeloma Initiating Cell Fate , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[10]  Michael B Yaffe,et al.  TAZ as a novel enhancer of MyoD‐mediated myogenic differentiation , 2010, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[11]  Erkang Wang,et al.  Landscape topography determines global stability and robustness of a metabolic network. , 2012, ACS synthetic biology.

[12]  P. Janmey,et al.  Transcription factor regulation by mechanical stress. , 2012, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[13]  I. A. Rogov,et al.  in vitro MYOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION OF BOVINE MULTIPOTENT MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS TAKEN FROM BONE MARROW AND ADIPOSE TISSUE , 2012 .

[14]  W. Ebeling.  Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[15]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels , 2013, Nature materials.

[16]  F. Guilak,et al.  Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[17]  Jin-Su Kim,et al.  Stiffness of Hydrogels Regulates Cellular Reprogramming Efficiency Through Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial Transition and Stemness Markers. , 2016, Macromolecular bioscience.

[18]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Role of substratum stiffness in modulating genes associated with extracellular matrix and mechanotransducers YAP and TAZ. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Forcing stem cells to behave: a biophysical perspective of the cellular microenvironment. , 2012, Annual review of biophysics.

[21]  Qing Nie,et al.  Interactions and tradeoffs between cell recruitment, proliferation, and differentiation affect CNS regeneration. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[22]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying Cell Fate Decisions for Differentiation and Reprogramming of a Human Stem Cell Network: Landscape and Biological Paths , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Erkang Wang,et al.  Potential and flux landscapes quantify the stability and robustness of budding yeast cell cycle network , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Michael B. Yaffe,et al.  TAZ: A β-Catenin-like Molecule that Regulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation , 2006 .

[25]  Mikala Egeblad,et al.  Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling , 2009, Cell.

[26]  Sho Fujisawa,et al.  Nuclear CDKs Drive Smad Transcriptional Activation and Turnover in BMP and TGF-β Pathways , 2009, Cell.

[27]  Meiyu Sun,et al.  Mechanism of regulation of stem cell differentiation by matrix stiffness , 2015, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[28]  Sangkyun Cho,et al.  Fractal heterogeneity in minimal matrix models of scars modulates stiff-niche stem-cell responses via the nuclear exit of a mechanorepressor , 2015, Nature materials.

[29]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Stochastic gene expression as a many-body problem , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Stefano Piccolo,et al.  Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Nuclear Lamin-A Scales with Tissue Stiffness and Enhances Matrix-Directed Differentiation , 2013, Science.

[32]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , .

[33]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[34]  Thomas Benjamin,et al.  TAZ, a Transcriptional Modulator of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation , 2005, Science.

[35]  L. Aravind,et al.  Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture. , 2012, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[36]  E. Aurell,et al.  Dynamics inside the cancer cell attractor reveal cell heterogeneity, limits of stability, and escape , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[38]  D. G. T. Strange,et al.  Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. , 2012, Nature materials.

[39]  Florian Rehfeldt,et al.  Hyaluronic acid matrices show matrix stiffness in 2D and 3D dictates cytoskeletal order and myosin-II phosphorylation within stem cells. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[40]  Darren Paul Burke,et al.  Substrate Stiffness and Oxygen as Regulators of Stem Cell Differentiation during Skeletal Tissue Regeneration: A Mechanobiological Model , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  Seyed Jamaleddin Mousavi,et al.  Role of Mechanical Cues in Cell Differentiation and Proliferation: A 3D Numerical Model , 2015, PloS one.

[42]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[43]  Uri Alon,et al.  Logarithmic and Power Law Input-Output Relations in Sensory Systems with Fold-Change Detection , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  Brian Ingalls,et al.  Mathematical Modeling in Systems Biology: An Introduction , 2013 .

[45]  Gideon A. Rodan,et al.  Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass , 2003, Nature.

[46]  Judit Zsuga,et al.  The Hill equation and the origin of quantitative pharmacology , 2012 .

[47]  M Browne,et al.  A prediction of cell differentiation and proliferation within a collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold subjected to mechanical strain and perfusive fluid flow. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[48]  Michael B Yaffe,et al.  TAZ: a beta-catenin-like molecule that regulates mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. , 2006, Cell cycle.

[49]  Hung-Chih Kuo,et al.  Loss of non-coding RNA expression from the DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus correlates with reduced neural differentiation potential in human embryonic stem cell lines , 2015, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[50]  Jin Wang,et al.  Potential landscape and flux framework of nonequilibrium networks: Robustness, dissipation, and coherence of biochemical oscillations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Jae-Won Shin,et al.  Stem cell mechanobiology: diverse lessons from bone marrow. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[52]  Chunhe Li,et al.  Landscape and flux reveal a new global view and physical quantification of mammalian cell cycle , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  W. Baker.  A review of models of landscape change , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[54]  Eugene L. Allgower,et al.  Numerical continuation methods - an introduction , 1990, Springer series in computational mathematics.

[55]  Hiroyuki Honda,et al.  Morphology-Based Prediction of Osteogenic Differentiation Potential of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2013, PloS one.

[56]  Lonnie D Shea,et al.  Dynamic transcription factor activity networks in response to independently altered mechanical and adhesive microenvironmental cues. , 2016, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[57]  Dongyuan Lü,et al.  Differential regulation of morphology and stemness of mouse embryonic stem cells by substrate stiffness and topography. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[58]  Giuseppe Basso,et al.  YAP/TAZ Incorporation in the β-Catenin Destruction Complex Orchestrates the Wnt Response , 2014, Cell.

[59]  Todd C. McDevitt,et al.  Materials as stem cell regulators. , 2014, Nature materials.

[60]  Meng Chen,et al.  Noise Attenuation in the ON and OFF States of Biological Switches , 2013, ACS synthetic biology.

[61]  Joachim P. Spatz,et al.  Erratum: Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate (Nature Materials (2012) 11 (642-649)) , 2012 .

[62]  Zhiyong He,et al.  Rho/Rock signal transduction pathway is required for MSC tenogenic differentiation , 2015, Bone Research.

[63]  Thomas R. Cox,et al.  Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer , 2011, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[64]  Eric H Davidson,et al.  Modeling the dynamics of transcriptional gene regulatory networks for animal development. , 2009, Developmental biology.

[65]  Yu Suk Choi,et al.  Interplay of Matrix Stiffness and Protein Tethering in Stem Cell Differentiation , 2014, Nature materials.

[66]  Meng Sun,et al.  A Computational Model of YAP/TAZ Mechanosensing. , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[67]  Jeremy J Mao,et al.  Cytoskeletal Changes of Mesenchymal Stem Cells During Differentiation , 2007, ASAIO journal.

[68]  P. Bonaldo,et al.  Extracellular matrix: A dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[69]  Kristi S. Anseth,et al.  Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate , 2014, Nature materials.