For Better or For Worse? Valenced Comparative Frames and Regulatory Focus

Three experiments examine how prevention-focused and promotion-focused consumers evaluate the comparison brand and what information they anchor on in direct comparative ads framed positively or negatively. Negative (vs. positive) frames lead prevention-focused respondents to exhibit higher evaluations for the advertised brand and lower evaluations for the comparison brand. Under promotion focus, positive (vs. negative) frames lead to more favorable attitudes toward the advertised brand with no difference in attitudes for the comparison brand. Preference for consistency is posited as a possible process explanation. We also find an evaluation order effect: prevention-focused (promotion-focused) individuals evaluate the comparison (advertised) brand first. (c) 2007 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..

[1]  S. Posavac,et al.  Valenced Comparisons , 2004 .

[2]  Durairaj Maheswaran,et al.  Motivated Reasoning in Outcome-Bias Effects , 2005 .

[3]  John W. Payne,et al.  Does Elaboration Increase or Decrease the Effectiveness of Negatively versus Positively Framed Messages , 2004 .

[4]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Maria L. Cronley,et al.  Comparative Advertising: Effects of Structural Alignability on Target Brand Evaluations , 2002 .

[6]  N. Liberman,et al.  Distinguishing Gains from Nonlosses and Losses from Nongains: A Regulatory Focus Perspective on Hedonic Intensity , 2000 .

[7]  S. Ratneshwar,et al.  The Use of Comparative Advertising for Brand Positioning: Association versus Differentiation , 1991 .

[8]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Preference for Consistency: The Development of a Valid Measure and the Discovery of Surprising Behavioral Implications , 1995 .

[9]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[10]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[11]  E. Higgins.  The "self digest": self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  Ideals and Oughts and the Reliance of Affect Versus Substance in Persuasion , 2004 .

[13]  R. Cialdini,et al.  When Saying Yes Leads to Saying No: Preference for Consistency and the Reverse Foot-in-the-Door Effect , 2001 .

[14]  Preference Consistency and Preference Strength: Processing and Judgmental issues1 , 2003 .

[15]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Exploring Message Framing Outcomes When Systematic, Heuristic, or Both Types of Processing Occur , 2004 .

[16]  Alexander Chernev,et al.  Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo , 2004 .

[17]  E. Higgins.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[18]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions , 2006 .

[19]  N Liberman,et al.  Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: implications for attributional functions. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Bryan Gibson,et al.  The role of attribute knowledge and overall evaluations in comparative judgment , 1991 .

[21]  D. Maheswaran,et al.  Motivated Reasoning: A Depth-of-Processing Perspective , 2000 .

[22]  Gary Natriello.  FOCUS , 1985, Digital-Age Innovation in Higher Education.

[23]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice , 2003 .

[24]  E. Higgins,et al.  Performance incentives and means: how regulatory focus influences goal attainment. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  D. Maheswaran,et al.  The Effects of Self-Construal and Commitment on Persuasion , 2005 .

[26]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Comparative versus Noncomparative Advertising: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[27]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Regulatory Focus and the Probability Estimates of Conjunctive and Disjunctive Events , 2002 .

[28]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[29]  D. Maheswaran,et al.  When More May Be Less: The Effects of Regulatory Focus on Responses to Different Comparative Frames , 2006 .

[30]  Daniel Cervone,et al.  Sequence Anchoring and Self-Efficacy: Primacy Effects in the Consideration of Possibilities , 1989 .

[31]  F. Kardes,et al.  The Role of Direction of Comparison, Attribute-Based Processing, and Attitude-Based Processing in Consumer Preference , 1999 .