Multi-Layer Multi-Index Comprehensive Evaluation for Dike Safety

Dike safety is influenced by many factors. The contribution of every factor can be reflected with multiple indexes. To implement the reasonable evaluation for dike safety, a multiple indexes-based layer-by-layer evaluation approach is proposed in this paper. Extension theory, genetic algorithm and analytical hierarchy process are combined to identify the effects of all indexes on dike safety. First, a multi-layer system is built to describe the relationship between dike safety and its main influencing factors, evaluation indexes. Safety level and corresponding quantitative criteria of evaluation indexes are given. Second, the matter element analysis method in extension theory is introduced to establish the multi-index evaluation model. The relative importance of evaluation indexes can be determined and dike safety can be evaluated dynamically with the model. Third, to decrease artificial participation during the evaluating process and make the assessment result more objective, an accelerating genetic algorithm is integrated into analytical hierarchy process to calculate the weights of lower layer indexes in multi-layer evaluation system of dike safety. Finally, the proposed approach is applied to an actual dike case. Results show that the methodology is capable of more objectively judging whole dike safety, can help with identifying potential risk and hazard level.

[1]  Huaizhi Su,et al.  A Method for Evaluating Sea Dike Safety , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[2]  Hocine Oumeraci,et al.  Modeling sea dike breaching induced by breaking wave impact-laboratory experiments and computational model , 2012 .

[3]  A. Burcu Altan-Sakarya,et al.  Optimization of Multireservoir Systems by Genetic Algorithm , 2011 .

[4]  Bojan Srdjevic,et al.  Fuzzy AHP Assessment of Water Management Plans , 2008 .

[5]  Peter M. A. Sloot,et al.  An Approach for Real-Time Levee Health Monitoring Using Signal Processing Methods , 2013, ICCS.

[6]  Larry W. Mays,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Optimal Operation of Soil Aquifer Treatment Systems , 1998 .

[7]  Su-chin Chen,et al.  Determining landslide susceptibility in Central Taiwan from rainfall and six site factors using the analytical hierarchy process method. , 2009 .

[8]  G. T. Raadgever,et al.  Assessing Stability and Dynamics in Flood Risk Governance , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Fuzzy Judgments and Fuzzy Sets , 2010, Int. J. Strateg. Decis. Sci..

[10]  Wang Zi Discussion on several related problems of the levee's safety assessment , 2003 .

[11]  Timo Hämäläinen,et al.  Accelerating genetic algorithm computation in tree shaped parallel computer , 1996, J. Syst. Archit..

[12]  Dennis J. Parker,et al.  An evaluation of flood forecasting, warning and response systems in the European Union , 1996 .

[13]  Huaizhi Su,et al.  Dam health diagnosis and evaluation , 2005 .

[14]  Li Qing Slope stability analysis of lower reaches? dikes of Yellow River under flood immersion and water level rapid drawdown , 2011 .

[15]  Youyin Jing,et al.  Application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and extenics theory for building energy conservation assessment , 2009 .

[16]  H. G. Wind,et al.  From Design to Application of a Decision-support System for Integrated River-basin Management , 2009 .

[17]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz,et al.  River Floods in the Changing Climate—Observations and Projections , 2010 .