Material behaviour characterisation using SHPB techniques, tests and simulations

Abstract The split Hopkinson pressure bar technique is extensively used to characterise material behaviour at high strain rates. In this paper, this technique is re-examined in order to optimise its accuracy, to improve its capacity and to develop innovating applications. The accuracy of the basic SHPB measurements which are forces and velocities at both sample faces is discussed and it depends on data processing which consists mostly of an accurate dispersion correction and of an exact delay setting. A deconvolution method is developed to increase measuring duration and consequently the maximum measurable strain. A one-dimensional numerical transient simulation of SHPB tests is used to analyse the validity of the average stress–strain curve obtained from measured forces and velocities. A fictitious specimen with a rate-sensitive behaviour described by a Sokolovsky–Malvern type constitutive model is used for this simulation. For the case where the classical SHPB analyses do not give acceptable results, an identification technique based on an inverse calculation method is presented. It permits relating material properties to forces and particle velocities measured at both faces of the specimen without using the assumption of axial uniformity of stresses and strains. Structural tests using a large SHPB, crushing of metallic tube for instance, can be performed in order to provide accurate data to validate identified constitutive laws. Simulations with commercial explicit code (Radioss) showing a good agreement with experimental data is also presented.

[1]  J. M. Lifshitz,et al.  Data processing in the split Hopkinson pressure bar tests , 1994 .

[2]  Han Zhao A constitutive model for metals over a large range of strain rates : Identification for mild-steel and aluminium sheets , 1997 .

[3]  A. F. Conn On the use of thin wafers to study dynamic properties of metals , 1965 .

[4]  Herbert Kolsky,et al.  Stress Waves in Solids , 2003 .

[5]  D. A. Gorham,et al.  A numerical method for the correction of dispersion in pressure bar signals , 1983 .

[6]  Z. Malinowski,et al.  Dynamic Frictional Effects as Measured from the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar , 1979 .

[7]  J. D. Campbell,et al.  The yield behaviour of mild steel in dynamic compression , 1956, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  Gérard Gary,et al.  A new method for the separation of waves. Application to the SHPB technique for an unlimited duration of measurement , 1997 .

[9]  G. Gary,et al.  CORRECTION DE DISPERSION POUR L'ANALYSE DES PETITES DÉFORMATIONS AUX BARRES DE HOPKINSON , 1991 .

[10]  R. Davies A critical study of the Hopkinson pressure bar , 1948, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[11]  V. H. Neubert,et al.  Difference method for wave analysis of the split hopkinson pressure bar with a viscoelastic specimen , 1967 .

[12]  U. S. Lindholm Some experiments with the split hopkinson pressure bar , 1964 .

[13]  J. G. Williams,et al.  Thickness effects in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests , 1993 .

[14]  Sia Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Hopkinson techniques for dynamic recovery experiments , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[15]  Bengt Lundberg,et al.  Analysis of elastic waves from two-point strain measurement , 1977 .

[16]  B. Hopkinson A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high explosives or by the impact of bullets , 1914 .

[17]  D. Bancroft The Velocity of Longitudinal Waves in Cylindrical Bars , 1941 .

[18]  C. K. H. Dharan,et al.  Determination of stress-strain characteristics at very high strain rates , 1970 .

[19]  W. E. Jahsman,et al.  Reexamination of the Kolsky Technique for Measuring Dynamic Material Behavior , 1971 .

[20]  J. Färm,et al.  Dynamic fracture toughness determined from load-point displacement , 1994 .

[21]  C. Chree The Equations of an Isotropic Elastic Solid in Polar and Cylindrical Co-ordinates their Solution and Application , 1889 .

[22]  Han Zhao,et al.  A study of specimen thickness effects in the impact tests on polymers by numeric simulations , 1998 .

[23]  F. Hauser,et al.  Techniques for measuring stress-strain relations at high strain rates , 1966 .

[24]  L. E. Malvern,et al.  Dispersion Investigation in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar , 1990 .

[25]  J. Bell,et al.  An experimental diffraction grating study of the quasi-static hypothesis of the split hopkinson bar experiment , 1966 .

[26]  L. Pochhammer,et al.  Ueber die Fortpflanzungsgeschwindigkeiten kleiner Schwingungen in einem unbegrenzten isotropen Kreiscylinder. , 1876 .

[27]  Gérard Gary,et al.  A three dimensional analytical solution of the longitudinal wave propagation in an infinite linear viscoelastic cylindrical bar. Application to experimental techniques , 1995 .

[28]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Experimental Study of Dispersive Waves in Beam and Rod Using FFT , 1978 .

[29]  P. S. Follansbee,et al.  Wave Propagation in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar , 1983 .

[30]  J. D. Campbell,et al.  Tensile Testing of Materials at Impact Rates of Strain , 1960 .

[31]  Pierre Collet,et al.  An optimisation method for separating and rebuilding one-dimensional dispersive waves from multi-point measurements. Application to elastic or viscoelastic bars , 2002 .

[32]  J. R. Klepaczko,et al.  A unified analytic and numerical approach to specimen behaviour in the Split-Hopkinson pressure bar , 1986 .

[33]  L. D. Bertholf,et al.  Two-dimensional analysis of the split hopkinson pressure bar system☆ , 1975 .

[34]  S. C. Hunter,et al.  The Dynamic Compression Testing of Solids by the Method of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar , 1963 .

[35]  H. Kolsky An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at very High Rates of Loading , 1949 .

[36]  J. Duffy,et al.  On the Use of a Torsional Split Hopkinson Bar to Study Rate Effects in 1100-0 Aluminum , 1971 .