Mechanism Design with Unknown Correlated Distributions: Can We Learn Optimal Mechanisms?

Due to Cremer and McLean (1985), it is well known that in a setting where bidders' values are correlated, an auction designer can extract the full social surplus as revenue. However, this result strongly relies on the assumption of a common prior distribution between the mechanism designer and the bidders. A natural question to ask is, can a mechanism designer distinguish between a set of possible distributions, or failing that, use a finite number of samples from the true distribution to learn enough about the distribution to recover the Cremer and Mclean result? We show that if a bidder's distribution is one of a countably infinite sequence of potential distributions that converges to an independent private values distribution, then there is no mechanism that can guarantee revenue more than \epsilon greater than the optimal mechanism over the independent private value mechanism, even with sampling from the true distribution. We also show that any mechanism over this infinite sequence can guarantee at most a (Theta + 1)/(2 + epsilon) approximation, where Theta is the number of bidder types, to the revenue achievable by a mechanism where the designer knows the bidder's distribution. Finally, as a positive result, we show that for any distribution where full surplus extraction as revenue is possible, a mechanism exists that guarantees revenue arbitrarily close to full surplus for sufficiently close distributions. Intuitively, our results suggest that a high degree of correlation will be essential in the effective application of correlated mechanism design techniques to settings with uncertain distributions.

[1]  D. H. Martin On the continuity of the maximum in parametric linear programming , 1975 .

[2]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[3]  Richard P. McLean,et al.  Optimal Selling Strategies under Uncertainty for a Discriminating Monopolist When Demands Are Interdependent , 1985 .

[4]  Richard P. McLean,et al.  FULL EXTRACTION OF THE SURPLUS IN BAYESIAN AND DOMINANT STRATEGY AUCTIONS , 1988 .

[5]  R. Gibbons Game theory for applied economists , 1992 .

[6]  P. Reny,et al.  Correlated Information and Mechanism Design , 1992 .

[7]  Chris Shannon,et al.  Uncertainty in Mechanism Design , 2021, 2108.12633.

[8]  Sergei Severinov,et al.  Individually rational, budget-balanced mechanisms and allocation of surplus , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.

[9]  Peter Stone,et al.  Adaptive Auction Mechanism Design and the Incorporation of Prior Knowledge , 2010, INFORMS J. Comput..

[10]  Nima Haghpanah,et al.  Optimal auctions for correlated buyers with sampling , 2014, EC.

[11]  Yashodhan Kanoria,et al.  Incentive-Compatible Learning of Reserve Prices for Repeated Auctions , 2014, WINE.

[12]  Mehryar Mohri,et al.  Optimal Regret Minimization in Posted-Price Auctions with Strategic Buyers , 2014, NIPS.

[13]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Assessing the Robustness of Cremer-McLean with Automated Mechanism Design , 2015, AAAI.

[14]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  On the Pseudo-Dimension of Nearly Optimal Auctions , 2015, NIPS.

[15]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  Learning valuation distributions from partial observations , 2015, AAAI 2015.

[16]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  The Pseudo-Dimension of Near-Optimal Auctions , 2015, NIPS 2015.

[17]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  Learning Valuation Distributions from Partial Observation , 2014, AAAI.

[18]  Mehryar Mohri,et al.  Learning Algorithms for Second-Price Auctions with Reserve , 2016, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Maximizing Revenue with Limited Correlation: The Cost of Ex-Post Incentive Compatibility , 2016, AAAI.

[20]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Automated Design of Robust Mechanisms , 2017, AAAI.