A modeling approach for mixing and reaction in wetlands with continuously varying flow

Abstract Prior investigations have examined steady-state flow in surface flow treatment wetlands, with mixing modeled as advection-dominated, and reaction calculated using flow-weighted averages over collections of stream tubes with different velocities. This work extends these concepts to non-steady flow conditions and temporally varying inlet concentrations. The essential construct that makes the approach feasible is definition of a set of reference (steady) state conditions under which the residence time distribution (RTD) and stream-tube specific rate constants are defined. Residence time in any stream tube under non-steady flow is treated as a linear function of its reference-condition residence time, and the overall wetland retention time under both mean and varying flow regimes. Outlet concentration is found by convolution of the reaction term with a varying inlet concentration function. For real-world flow and concentration data collected at discrete points in time, integration for outlet concentration is approximated using linear interpolation to generate inlet concentrations and velocities at intermediate points in time. The approach is examined using data from the literature. Vegetation density and depth distributions are seen as central in determining mixing and treatment performance.

[1]  Stream Velocity Profiles and Longitudinal Dispersion , 1997 .

[2]  G. Dagan Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Robert H. Kadlec,et al.  Application of residence time distributions to stormwater treatment systems , 1996 .

[4]  Timothy R. Ginn,et al.  Stochastic‐Convective Transport with Nonlinear Reaction: Mathematical Framework , 1995 .

[5]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in a stratified aquifer , 1979 .

[6]  C. Martinez,et al.  Hydraulic Analysis of Orlando Easterly Wetland , 2003 .

[7]  Mark E Grismer,et al.  Simulation Evaluation of the Effects of Non‐Uniform Flow and Degradation Parameter Uncertainty on Subsurface‐Flow Constructed Wetland Performance , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[8]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico , 2000, Nature.

[9]  H. Nepf Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation , 1999 .

[10]  C. Bolster,et al.  Development and evaluation of a mathematical model for surface-water flow within the Shark River Slough of the Florida Everglades , 2002 .

[11]  Heidi Nepf,et al.  Scalar transport in random cylinder arrays at moderate Reynolds number , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  J. Jawitz,et al.  Rejuvenating the largest municipal treatment wetland in Florida , 2006 .

[13]  H. R. Hamilton,et al.  Current Velocity and Its Effect on Aquatic Macrophytes in Flowing Waters. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  B. Berkowitz,et al.  Measurement and analysis of non-Fickian dispersion in heterogeneous porous media. , 2003, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[15]  R. Kadlec Overland flow in wetlands: vegetation resistance. , 1990 .

[16]  Larry C. Brown,et al.  Effects of wetland depth and flow rate on residence time distribution characteristics , 2004 .

[17]  P. V. Danckwerts Continuous flow systems. Distribution of residence times , 1995 .

[18]  Forrest E. Dierberg,et al.  Relationship between hydraulic efficiency and phosphorus removal in a submerged aquatic vegetation-dominated treatment wetland , 2005 .

[19]  Robert H. Kadlec,et al.  The inadequacy of first-order treatment wetland models , 2000 .

[20]  Robert H. Kadlec,et al.  Wetland residence time distribution modeling , 2000 .

[21]  S. Chapra Surface Water-Quality Modeling , 1996 .

[22]  R. Alexander,et al.  Estimates of diffuse phosphorus sources in surface waters of the United States using a spatially referenced watershed model. , 2004, Water Science and Technology.

[23]  Heidi Nepf,et al.  The Effects of Vegetation on Longitudinal Dispersion , 1997 .

[24]  Antonis D. Koussis,et al.  Analytical solutions to non-Fickian subsurface dispersion in uniform groundwater flow , 1996 .

[25]  P. V. Danckwerts Continuous flow systems , 1953 .

[26]  Damköhler number distributions and constituent removal in treatment wetlands , 2002 .

[27]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The dispersion of matter in turbulent flow through a pipe , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[28]  J. Wen,et al.  Contaminant spreading in stratified soils with fractal permeability distribution , 1993 .

[29]  W. Wise,et al.  Evaluation of past and potential phosphorus uptake at the Orlando Easterly Wetland , 2003 .

[30]  O. Levenspiel Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1972 .

[31]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  A 2-D, diffusion-based, wetland flow model , 1997 .

[32]  L. Gelhar Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology , 1992 .