Mate Density, Predation Risk, and the Seasonal Sequence of Mate Choices: A Dynamic Game

We describe and analyze a computer-simulation model of mate choice, featuring two different quality groups (based on offspring per mating) in each sex. Mating between quality groups results from two-dimensional random encounter and mutual assent, where assent reflects an attempt to maximize expected lifetime reproductive success, E(LRS). Premating predation (via random encounter with predators) and other mortality also influence E(LRS). Given potentially conflicting optimal choices, the model finds the evolutionarily stable patterns of choosiness for the four quality groups. When there are multiple mating episodes by individuals through the season, the resulting dynamic game is solved to obtain a seasonal pattern of mate choice and reproduction. The model generates seven different mating patterns among quality groups. These patterns imply different opportunities for selection, as indicated by the variance components of normalized lifetime reproductive success, var(LRS). The changes in E(LRS), var(LRS), and mating patterns in response to different densities of predators and of potential mates are explored in detail. Decreasing predation risk or increasing mate availability tends to increase E(LRS), choosiness, and assortative mating. Var(LRS) and thus the opportunity for selection for mate quality is highest at intermediate densities of predators and of potential mates. When density remains constant throughout the mating season, choosiness increases late in the season, a time at which less of the potential E(LRS) is jeopardized by the greater predation risk associated with choosiness. Reproductive success of the low-quality group of the less choosy sex is particularly sensitive to changes in density and other parameters. When seasonal density patterns of predators and potential mates are predictable, these low-quality individuals should do better and may thus be more numerous when mate densities are high and predator densities are low, or when predator densities are high and mate densities are low, than for other combinations of relative densities.

[1]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1961 .

[2]  A. Dickson On Evolution , 1884, Science.

[3]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The Evolution of Sexual Differences in Insects , 1986 .

[4]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology , 2019 .

[5]  M. Wade Sexual Selection and Variance in Reproductive Success , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[6]  B. O. Koopman The Theory of Search. I. Kinematic Bases , 1956 .

[7]  J. Hafernik,et al.  Mating Success and Survival Rate in a Population of Damselflies: Results at Variance with Theory? , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[8]  A. Arak The Túngara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication, Michael J. Ryan. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London (1985), xv, +230. Price £27.95 hardback, £12.75 paperback , 1986 .

[9]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[10]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  On the Correlation between Mating Success and Offspring Quality in Drosophila melanogaster , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[11]  G. K. Morris,et al.  Bat Predation and Its Influence on Calling Behavior in Neotropical Katydids , 1987, Science.

[12]  R. Lande,et al.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  M. Kirkpatrick SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  N. Knowlton SEXUAL SELECTION AND DIMORPHISM IN TWO DEMES OF A SYMBIOTIC, PAIR‐BONDING SNAPPING SHRIMP , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  W. Schaffer Some observations on the evolution of reproductive rate and competitive ability in flowering plants. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[16]  T. Telecky,et al.  Copying Others, an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy for Mate Choice: A Model , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[17]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of Fighting Behaviour: Decision Rules and Assessment of Relative Strength , 1983 .

[18]  J. Manning,et al.  Mate Selection By Asellus (Crustacea: Isopoda) , 1981 .

[19]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[20]  W. Dominey Alternative Mating Tactics and Evolutionarily Stable Strategies , 1984 .

[21]  J. Endler A Predator’s View of Animal Color Patterns , 1978 .

[22]  I. F. Harvey Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, Jack W. Bradbury, Malte B. Andersson (Eds.). John Wiley, Chichester (1987), xi , 1988 .

[23]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: APPLICATIONS , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  C. Clark,et al.  Towards a Unifield Foraging Theory , 1986 .

[25]  W. Sutherland Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  A. Mäkelä Differential games in evolutionary theory: Height growth strategies of trees , 1985 .

[27]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Singing to attract a mate: a stochastic dynamic game , 1987 .

[28]  G. Parker,et al.  SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS , 1970 .

[29]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Environmental Variance in Lifetime Mating Success, Mate Choice, and Sexual Selection , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[30]  T. Vincent,et al.  Stability in an evolutionary game , 1984 .

[31]  Alternative Female Choice Tactics in the Scorpionfly Hylobittacus apicalis(Mecoptera) and Their Implications , 1984 .

[32]  J. Staddon,et al.  Limits to action, the allocation of individual behavior , 1982 .

[33]  K. Wells The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  M. Gross,et al.  Male mate choice in fishes , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  Allen J Moore,et al.  FEMALE STRATEGY DURING MATE CHOICE: THRESHOLD ASSESSMENT , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, and sperm precedence , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  J. Crow Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. , 1989, Human biology.

[38]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  B. Woodward Paternal Effects on Juvenile Growth in Scaphiopus multiplicatus (The New Mexico Spadefoot Toad) , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[40]  D. Mccauley,et al.  Mating Reduces Predation on Male Milkweed Beetles , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[41]  D. Rubenstein CHAPTER 3 – On the Evolution of Alternative Mating Strategies , 1980 .

[42]  W. Cade Symposium: Insect Behavioral Ecology--'79: Alternative Male Reproductive Behaviors , 1980 .

[43]  Linda Partridge,et al.  Mating patterns and mate choice , 1984 .

[44]  C. Boake A Method for Testing Adaptive Hypotheses of Mate Choice , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[45]  R. Sargent Territory quality, male quality, courtship intrusions, and female nest-choice in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  L. Partridge Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies , 1980, Nature.

[47]  M. Kirkpatrick SEXUAL SELECTION BY FEMALE CHOICE IN POLYGYNOUS ANIMALS , 1987 .