An Action Design Research Approach within Enterprise Engineering

Enterprise engineering (EE) is emerging as a new discipline that is multi-disciplinary in nature. As highlighted by researchers within the EE discipline, the current status of EE endeavours as taken by several universities is unclear, which led to several initiatives and publications to develop a research agenda within the enterprise engineering research community. This article builds upon existing work aimed at establishing EE as a discipline, also accepting the epistemological stance of idealism, pragmatism and existential phenomenology as argued by Hoogervorst as an appropriate stance for EE research, prior to suggesting action design research (ADR) as an appropriate research method for EE research. More so, the article presents an Action Design Research within Enterprise Engineering (ADR-in-EE) approach as the main contribution to guide prospective EE researchers towards research within the EE discipline. The ADR-in-EE approach is based on ADR, but provides additional guidance by incorporating the use of an Enterprise Evolution Contextualisation Model, as well as creativity facilitation in the form of Univation’s brainstorming method. As a second contribution, we experiment with the ADR-in-EE approach and use a survey to extract feedback on the usefulness of the approach. The research findings are mostly positive, with qualitative feedback on further improving ADR-in-EE approach.

[1]  Justin Buchler,et al.  Philosophy: An Introduction , 1971 .

[2]  Scott A. Bernard.  An Introduction to Enterprise Architecture , 2004 .

[3]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution , 2006 .

[4]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[5]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .

[6]  Marne De Vries.  Using a Classification Schema to Compare Business-IT Alignment Approaches , 2013 .

[7]  A. Hatchuel,et al.  The Interplay between Creativity Issues and Design Theories: A New Perspective for Design Management Studies? , 2011 .

[8]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[9]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Alta van der Merwe,et al.  Towards an enterprise evolution contextualisation model , 2013, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Enterprise Systems: ES 2013.

[11]  Alta van der Merwe,et al.  The Enterprise Engineering Domain , 2015, EEWC.

[12]  Jan Fedorowicz,et al.  Increasing Understanding of Technology Management through Challenge Mapping , 2000 .

[13]  Abraham B. Shani,et al.  Creating Action Research Quality in Organization Development: Rigorous, Reflective and Relevant , 2014 .

[14]  Jan A. P. Hoogervorst,et al.  Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering , 2009, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[15]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[16]  James R. Armstrong.  3.3.1 Divergent Thinking in Systems Engineering Practice: Is There a Shortfall? , 2009 .

[17]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. , 1994 .

[18]  Kees Dorst,et al.  The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application , 2011 .

[19]  E. Bono.  Six Thinking Hats , 1985 .

[20]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[21]  Victor V. Kryssanov,et al.  Understanding design fundamentals: how synthesis and analysis drive creativity, resulting in emergence , 2001, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[22]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[23]  M. Mumford,et al.  Solving Everyday Problems Creatively: The Role of Problem Construction and Personality Type , 1998 .

[24]  R. Tarnas,et al.  The Passion of the Western Mind , 1991 .

[25]  Min Basadur,et al.  Collaborative Problem Solving Through Creativity in Problem Definition: Expanding the Pie , 2000 .

[26]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[27]  Edward De Bono,et al.  Serious Creativity: Using the Power of Lateral Thinking to Create New Ideas , 1992 .

[28]  Hans B. F. Mulder,et al.  The discipline of enterprise engineering , 2013 .

[29]  M. Emery.  The Current Version of Emery's Open Systems Theory , 2000 .

[30]  Leon A. Kappelman.  The SIM Guide to Enterprise Architecture , 2009 .

[31]  D. Vernon,et al.  Thinking hats and good men: structured techniques in a problem construction task , 2014 .

[32]  R. Reiter-Palmon,et al.  Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future? , 2009 .

[33]  Nancy A. Fontenot.  Effects of Training in Creativity and Creative Problem Finding upon Business People , 1993 .

[34]  J. Mingers,et al.  Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited : problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict , 1989 .

[35]  G. Weinberg.  An Introduction to General Systems Thinking , 1975 .

[36]  U. Kothari,et al.  Development Theory and Practice , 2001 .

[37]  Michael Michalko,et al.  Thinkertoys: A Handbook of Creative-Thinking Techniques , 1991 .

[38]  Alta van der Merwe,et al.  Extending the enterprise evolution contextualisation model , 2017, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[39]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research , 2006 .

[40]  Alta van der Merwe,et al.  The Nature of the Enterprise Engineering Discipline , 2014, EEWC.

[41]  Selçuk Sönmez,et al.  Systems Thinking Managing Chaos and Complexity , 2014 .

[42]  Roderick M. Chisholm,et al.  Theory of Knowledge , 1989 .