Fetal shoulder measurements by fast and ultrafast MRI techniques

The purpose of this study was to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of fetal shoulder measurements of fetuses with suspected macrosomia. The actual fetal shoulder measurements made immediately after birth were compared with measurements obtained by fast and ultrafast MRI techniques antepartum. Eight singleton diabetic pregnant mothers underwent MRI examination with fast imaging in steady‐state precession (TrueFISP) and spin‐echo (SE) and gradient‐echo (GE) echo‐planar (EPI) sequences to show the fetal shoulder width. The actual shoulder width was measured immediately postpartum by a neonatologist. There was a statistically significant correlation between the MRI measurements and the actual shoulder width (P < 0.001 – P < 0.05) for all sequences. TrueFISP (r = 0.98, P < 0.001) was superior to EPI sequences (r = 0.88, P < 0.01 for SE EPI and r = 0.80, P < 0.05 for GE EPI). The images of all three sequences used were free of major motion artifacts. Fast and ultrafast sequences seem to be reliable for fetal shoulder measurements and the TrueFISP was the most accurate sequence compared to SE and GE echo‐planar sequences. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:938–942. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Wilsdon,et al.  MR Pelvimetry — A Practical Alternative , 1992, Acta radiologica.

[2]  V. Hiilesmaa,et al.  Hyperinsulinemia and Macrosomia in the Fetus of the Diabetic Mother , 1994, Diabetes Care.

[3]  R R Edelman,et al.  Fetal anatomy revealed with fast MR sequences. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  P. Mansfield,et al.  Fetal weight estimation by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging , 1994, The Lancet.

[5]  R. Vanninen,et al.  MRI does not change fetal cardiotocographic parameters , 1998, Prenatal diagnosis.

[6]  H. Aronen,et al.  Low-field MRI pelvimetry , 1997, European Radiology.

[7]  R. Geirsson,et al.  Humerospinous distance measurements: accuracy and usefulness for predicting shoulder dystocia in delivery at term , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  C. Spong,et al.  Objective definition of shoulder dystocia: a prospective evaluation. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  O. Langer,et al.  Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  P. Mansfield,et al.  A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance , 1994 .

[11]  M Takahashi,et al.  MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  E. J. Adam,et al.  Trends in the use of pelvimetry techniques. , 1998, Clinical radiology.

[13]  E K Outwater,et al.  Ultrafast MR imaging of the pelvis. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[14]  A. Gangi,et al.  Fetal Shoulder Measurements with MRI , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  P. Voutilainen,et al.  Estimation of fetal shoulder width by measurement of the humerospinous distance by ultrasound , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  L. Marpeau,et al.  Newborn shoulder width: a prospective study of 2222 consecutive measurements , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[17]  E A Friedman,et al.  Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  T. Garite,et al.  Sonographic Prediction of Shoulder Dystocia in Infants of Diabetic Mothers , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.