Time consumption of planting after partial harvests

Partial harvesting combined with underplanting may be a means to reduce the risk of regeneration failure when e.g. unfavourable microclimatic conditions or severe damage by barkfeeding insects may be expected after clear-cutting, and to maintain or establish certain stand structures or tree species mixture. In this study, we performed time studies of manual planting with and without prior site preparation (patch scarification, inverting) in partially harvested stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). The harvest treatments included basal area removals of approx. 35, 45, and 55%, and a patch clear-cut treatment that was assumed to provide the same conditions for planting as conventional clear-cutting. Site preparation had a much larger influence on time consumption plant–1 (main time) than the harvest treatment. The lowest time consumption was found with inverting and the highest without site preparation. The time spent on walking between planting spots increased with decreasing harvest intensity, reflecting a lower density of planted seedlings in the partially harvested stands. A corresponding increase in main time per plant only occurred after site preparation, since the time spent on clearing the planting spot (removal of logging residue and humus) on untreated plots was higher at the higher harvest strengths. The variation in time consumption attributed to the six replicate stands was large and mainly due to the difference among stands planted by different workers.

[1]  I. Samset Forest operations as a scientific discipline , 1992 .

[2]  D. Carlson,et al.  Influence of shelter on night temperatures, frost damage, and bud break of white spruce seedlings , 1996 .

[3]  K. Hanssen,et al.  Effects of Partial Cutting and Scarification on Planted Picea abies at Mid-elevation Sites in South-east Norway , 2003 .

[4]  M. Karlsson,et al.  Establishing mixed forests in Sweden by combining planting and natural regeneration--Effects of shelterwoods and scarification , 2006 .

[5]  Ola Langvall,et al.  Effects of pine shelterwoods on microclimate and frost damage to Norway spruce seedlings , 2001 .

[6]  G. Örlander,et al.  The influence of Shelterwood density on Hylobius abietis (L.) occurrence and feeding on planted conifers , 1994 .

[7]  B. Hånell,et al.  Performance of planted and naturally regenerated seedlings in Picea abies-dominated shelterwood stands and clearcuts in Sweden , 2000 .

[8]  P. D. Kofman DEVELOPMENT OF THE SIWORK TIME STUDY PACKAGE FOR THE HUSKY HUNTER PORTABLE FIELD COMPUTER , 1989 .

[9]  C. Karlsson,et al.  Influence of Shelterwood Density on Survival and Height Increment of Picea abies Advance Growth , 2000 .

[10]  Magnus Petersson,et al.  Effectiveness of combinations of shelterwood, scarification, and feeding barriers to reduce pine weevil damage , 2003 .

[11]  I. Samset Some observations on time and performance studies in forestry , 1990 .

[12]  Pertti Harstela Principle of comparative time studies in mechanized forest work , 1988 .