Evaluation of the Impact of Timber Truck Configuration and Tare Weight on Payload Efficiency: An Australian Case Study

The forest industry tends to plan, and model transportation costs based on the potential payload benefits of increased legal gross vehicle weight (GVW) by deploying different configurations, while payload benefits of a configuration can be significantly influenced by the vehicle design tare weight. Through this research the relative benefit of increased legal GVW of different configurations is compared across Australia over a 13-year period from 2006 to 2019, by examining data collected post operation across multiple operations. This approach is intended to offer realistic insight to real operations not influenced by observation and thus reflect long-term operating behaviour. The inclusion of the three most common configuration classes in Australian forestry over a 13-year period has also allowed the exploration of load management between configurations and potential trends over time. When considering the legal GVW and the tare weight impacts across the fleets, the semi-trailer has an 8 t payload disadvantage compared to B-Doubles and 19.6 t disadvantage compared to road trains.

[1]  P. Anttila,et al.  The influence of gross vehicle weight (GVW) and transport distance on timber trucking performance indicators – Discrete event simulation case study in Central Finland , 2020 .

[2]  Timo Tahvanainen,et al.  Supply chain cost analysis of long-distance transportation of energy wood in Finland , 2011 .

[3]  S. A. Borz,et al.  Improving Environmental and Energy Efficiency in Wood Transportation for a Carbon-Neutral Forest Industry , 2020, Forests.

[4]  Mauricio Acuna,et al.  Analysing the effect of five operational factors on forest residue supply chain costs: A case study in Western Australia , 2013 .

[5]  John Sessions,et al.  Increasing value and reducing costs through hauling longer logs: opportunities and issues. , 2009 .

[6]  M W Brown The impact of tare weight on transportation efficiency in Australian forest operations , 2008 .

[7]  Mark Brown,et al.  Optimising transport efficiency and costs in Australian wood chipping operations , 2012 .

[8]  Thomas W. MacFarland,et al.  Kruskal–Wallis H-Test for Oneway Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) by Ranks , 2016 .

[9]  W. D. Greene,et al.  Improving Timber Trucking Performance by Reducing Variability of Log Truck Weights , 2007 .

[10]  Economic Benefit of Maximum Truck Weight Regulation Change for Estonian Forest Sector , 2011 .

[11]  S. A. Borz,et al.  Impacts of Road Infrastructure on the Environmental Efficiency of High Capacity Transportation in Harvesting of Renewable Wood Energy , 2021 .

[12]  D. Williamson,et al.  The box plot: a simple visual method to interpret data. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  Bruce Talbot,et al.  Systems Analysis of Ten Supply Chains for Whole Tree Chips , 2014 .

[14]  Juha Laitila,et al.  Cost analysis of transporting forest chips and forest industry by-products with large truck-trailers in Finland , 2016 .

[15]  Mark Brown,et al.  Timber Truck Payload Management with Different In-Forest Weighing Strategies in Australia , 2016 .

[16]  Heikki Liimatainen,et al.  Impacts of increasing maximum truck weight – case Finland , 2014 .

[17]  Gaussian Mixture Model to Characterize Payload Distributions for Predominant Truck Configurations and Body Types , 2020 .

[18]  Rafał Wojtan,et al.  Total Weight and Axle Loads of Truck Units in the Transport of Timber Depending on the Timber Cargo , 2018 .

[19]  David K Hein,et al.  Transportation of raw forest products in northern Ontario by trucks , 2013 .

[20]  R. Shaffer,et al.  A Checklist for Efficient Log Trucking , 2005 .

[21]  M. Acuna,et al.  Use of modelling to compare the impact of roadside drying of Pinus radiata D.Don logs and logging residues on delivered costs using high capacity trucks in Australia , 2021 .

[22]  J. Sessions,et al.  Methods to Manage and Optimize Forest Biomass Supply Chains: a Review , 2019, Current Forestry Reports.