Achieving a ‘top-down’ change agenda by driving and supporting a collaborative ‘bottom-up’ process: case study of a large-scale enhanced recovery programme

There is increasing recognition that organisations need to look beyond their boundaries for new innovations. However, the introduction and implementation of best practice that has been developed externally may need different processes of implementation if a successful change process is going to be achieved. Using an enhanced recovery programme as an example, we report a case study that combines the best of a top-down approach with the principles of bottom-up collaborative working to successfully embed a large-scale quality improvement programme that was commissioned to improve the adoption of enhanced recovery in elective surgery. We describe a large-scale change programme that was established, coordinated and driven from within a central ‘top’ organisation but delivered and owned locally by individual organisations working collaboratively across southeast region of England. We discuss why we believe our methodology of implementing this programme was successful, the important triggers for success and the lessons we learned from the programme.

[1]  Gwyn Bevan,et al.  Variations in health care: the good, the bad and the inexplicable. , 2011 .

[2]  John Gabbay,et al.  Skilled for improvement? Learning communities and the skills needed to improve care: an evaluative service development , 2014 .

[3]  Pál Ondrejka,et al.  ["Fast track" colorectal surgery]. , 2007, Orvosi hetilap.

[4]  E. Torbé,et al.  Enhanced recovery in gynaecology , 2013 .

[5]  S Cretin,et al.  Quality collaboratives: lessons from research , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[6]  D. Chambers,et al.  Initiatives to reduce length of stay in acute hospital settings: a rapid synthesis of evidence relating to enhanced recovery programmes , 2014 .

[7]  Claire Day Rmn Challenging Assumptions: a perspective on the process of generating and managing change , 2004 .

[8]  Donald M. Berwick,et al.  Connections Between Quality Measurement and Improvement , 2003, Medical care.

[9]  D. Gillatt,et al.  Introduction of an enhanced recovery protocol for radical cystectomy , 2008, BJU international.

[10]  J. Sachs,et al.  Peer review of learning and teaching in higher education : international perspectives , 2014 .

[11]  K. Martin,et al.  Enhanced recovery program for hip and knee replacement reduces death rate , 2011, Acta orthopaedica.

[12]  José Maria Paganni,et al.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. , 1966, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[13]  S. Leatherman,et al.  The quest for quality : refining the NHS reforms : a policy analysis and chartbook , 2008 .

[14]  A. Donabedian Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. , 1966, The Milbank quarterly.

[15]  D. N. Lucas,et al.  Enhanced recovery in obstetrics--a new frontier? , 2013, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.