Calcium looping CO2 capture system for back-up power plants

This paper analyses a CO2 capture system based on calcium looping, designed for power plants that operate with very low capacity factors and large load fluctuations, including shut-down and start-up periods. This can be achieved by decoupling the operation of the carbonator and calciner reactors and connecting them to piles filled with CaO or CaCO3. When the power plant enters into operation, calcined solids are fed into the carbonator to provide the necessary flow of CaO for capturing CO2 and storing the carbonated solids. An oxy-CFB calciner designed to have a modest thermal capacity and operate continuously refills the CaO pile. Mass and energy balances of the entire system, combined with state-of-the-art performance criteria for reactor design, have been solved to identify suitable operating windows. An analysis of the effect of the CaO reactivity of the material stored in the piles indicates that temperatures of around 500–600 °C in the carbonator are compatible with the storage of solids at low temperature (<250 °C). This, together with the low inherent cost of the material, allows large piles of stored material. Electricity costs between 0.13–0.15 $ per kWhe are possible for the system proposed in contrast to standard CaL systems where the cost would increase to above 0.19 $ per kWhe when forced to operate at low capacity. The proposed concept could be integrated into existing power plants operating as back-ups in renewable energy systems in preference to other CO2 capture technologies that are heavily penalized when forced to operate under low capacity factors.

[1]  Rosa Domenichini,et al.  Operating Flexibility of Power Plants with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) , 2013 .

[2]  Mónica Alonso,et al.  Reactivity of highly cycled particles of CaO in a carbonation/calcination loop , 2008 .

[3]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Operational flexibility options in power plants with integrated post-combustion capture , 2016 .

[4]  Peter Wasserscheid,et al.  A new concept for the global distribution of solar energy: energy carrying compounds , 2011 .

[5]  Wen-Chen Chang,et al.  Design and Experimental Testing of a 1.9MWth Calcium Looping Pilot Plant , 2014 .

[6]  Ajay R. Bidwe,et al.  Development of the calcium looping CO2 capture technology from lab to pilot scale at IFK, University of Stuttgart , 2014 .

[7]  Neil Hewitt,et al.  Estimating power plant start costs in cyclic operation , 2013 .

[8]  Chechet Biliyok,et al.  Calcium looping with inherent energy storage for decarbonisation of coal-fired power plant , 2016 .

[9]  Jean-Pierre Tranier,et al.  Oxycombustion for coal power plants: Advantages, solutions and projects , 2015 .

[10]  B. Arias,et al.  Emerging CO2 capture systems , 2015 .

[11]  Luca Mancuso,et al.  Co-production of hydrogen and electricity with CO2 capture , 2009 .

[12]  Douglas Hilleman,et al.  Power Plant Cycling Costs , 2012 .

[13]  John Davison,et al.  Flexible CCS plants–A key to near-zero emission electricity systems , 2011 .

[14]  Borja Arias,et al.  An analysis of the operation of a flexible oxy-fired CFB power plant integrated with a thermal energy storage system , 2016 .

[15]  A. Sánchez-Biezma,et al.  Oxy-fired fluidized bed combustors with a flexible power output using circulating solids for thermal energy storage , 2014 .

[16]  Magnus Korpås,et al.  Identifying Operational Requirements for Flexible CCS Power Plant in Future Energy Systems , 2016 .

[17]  Iain Staffell,et al.  The role of flexible CCS in the UK's future energy system , 2016 .

[18]  Alexander Mitsos,et al.  CaO-Based Energy and CO2 Storage System for the Flexibilization of an IGCC Plant with Carbon Capture , 2014 .

[19]  A. Sánchez-Biezma,et al.  Demonstration of steady state CO2 capture in a 1.7 MWth Calcium looping pilot , 2013 .

[20]  Susan E.B. Edwards,et al.  Calcium looping in solar power generation plants , 2012 .

[21]  R. Barker,et al.  The reversibility of the reaction CaCO3 ⇄ CaO+CO2 , 2007 .

[22]  M. E. Diego,et al.  Biomass combustion with in situ CO2 capture by CaO in a 300 kWth circulating fluidized bed facility , 2014 .

[23]  M. Leach,et al.  Valuing power plant flexibility with CCS: the case of post-combustion capture retrofits , 2012, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[24]  Eric Croiset,et al.  Process analysis of CO2 capture from flue gas using carbonation/calcination cycles , 2008 .

[25]  Cristian Dinca,et al.  Multi-fuel multi-product operation of IGCC power plants with carbon capture and storage (CCS) , 2015 .

[26]  Mónica Alonso,et al.  Operational feasibility of biomass combustion with in situ CO2 capture by CaO during 360 h in a 300 kWth calcium looping facility , 2016 .

[27]  D. D. Perlmutter,et al.  Effect of the product layer on the kinetics of the CO2‐lime reaction , 1983 .

[28]  Gemma Grasa,et al.  Review and research needs of Ca-Looping systems modelling for post-combustion CO2 capture applications , 2016 .

[29]  Dawid P. Hanak,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of oxy-combustion coal-fired power plant with cryogenic oxygen storage , 2017 .

[30]  Juan Carlos Abanades,et al.  Average activity of CaO particles in a calcium looping system , 2010 .

[31]  Ricardo Chacartegui,et al.  Thermochemical energy storage of concentrated solar power by integration of the calcium looping process and a CO2 power cycle , 2016 .

[32]  J. E. Davison,et al.  CO2 Capture in the Cement Industry , 2009 .

[33]  Mónica Alonso,et al.  Application of the random pore model to the carbonation cyclic reaction , 2009 .

[34]  O. Kolditz,et al.  Thermo-mechanical investigation of salt caverns for short-term hydrogen storage , 2017, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[35]  A. Sánchez-Biezma,et al.  Oxyfuel carbonation/calcination cycle for low cost CO2 capture in existing power plants , 2008 .

[36]  A. Özarslan Large-scale hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns , 2012 .

[37]  A. Sánchez-Biezma,et al.  Testing postcombustion CO2 capture with CaO in a 1.7 MWt pilot facility , 2013 .

[38]  Tobias Hirsch,et al.  A systematic comparison on power block efficiencies for CSP plants with direct steam generation , 2014 .

[39]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Determination of intrinsic rate constants of the CaO–CO2 reaction , 2008 .

[40]  M. R. Haines,et al.  Designing carbon capture power plants to assist in meeting peak power demand , 2009 .

[41]  Manuel Romero,et al.  A High-efficiency Solar Thermal Power Plant using a Dense Particle Suspension as the Heat Transfer Fluid☆ , 2015 .

[42]  Ningsheng Cai,et al.  Effect of Temperature on the Carbonation Reaction of CaO with CO2 , 2012 .

[43]  W. Hausz,et al.  Conceptual design of thermal energy storage systems for near term electric utility applications. Volume 1: Screening of concepts , 1978 .

[44]  T. Shimizu,et al.  A twin fluid-bed reactor for removal of CO2 from combustion processes , 1999 .