Socioeconomic inequalities in risk of congenital anomaly

AIMS To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in the risk of congenital anomalies, focusing on risk of specific anomaly subgroups. METHODS A total of 858 cases of congenital anomaly and 1764 non-malformed control births were collected between 1986 and 1993 from four UK congenital malformation registers, for the purposes of a European multicentre case control study on congenital anomaly risk near hazardous waste landfill sites. As a measure of socioeconomic status, cases and controls were given a value for the area level Carstairs deprivation index, by linking the postcode of residence at birth to census enumeration districts (areas of approximately 150 households). RESULTS Risk of non-chromosomal anomalies increased with increasing socioeconomic deprivation. The risk in the most deprived quintile of the deprivation index was 40% higher than in the most affluent quintile. Some malformation subgroups also showed increasing risk with increasing deprivation: all cardiac defects, malformations of the cardiac septa, malformations of the digestive system, and multiple malformations. No evidence for socioeconomic variation was found for other non-chromosomal malformation groups, including neural tube defects and oral clefts. A decreasing risk with increasing deprivation found for all chromosomal malformations and Down's syndrome in unadjusted analyses, occurred mainly as a result of differences in the maternal age distribution between social classes. CONCLUSION Our data, although based on limited numbers of cases and geographical coverage, suggest that more deprived populations have a higher risk of congenital anomalies of non-chromosomal origin and some specific anomalies. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore their aetiological implications.

[1]  S Raybould,et al.  Deprivation, low birth weight, and children's height: a comparison between rural and urban areas. , 1993, BMJ.

[2]  J. Little,et al.  Epidemiology and control of neural tube defects , 1993 .

[3]  H. Tillett,et al.  Geographical and Environmental Epidemiology: Methods for Small-Area Studies. , 1993, Epidemiology and Infection.

[4]  H. Dolk,et al.  Geographical variation in anophthalmia and microphthalmia in England, 1988-94. , 1998, BMJ.

[5]  D. Stone,et al.  Epidemiology of Down's syndrome in a Scottish city. , 1995, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[6]  M Vrijheid,et al.  Risk of congenital anomalies near hazardous-waste landfill sites in Europe: the EUROHAZCON study , 1998, The Lancet.

[7]  O. Catalano,et al.  Congenital anomalies , 2015, Histologic Basis of Ocular Disease in Animals.

[8]  A. Gray Inequalities in Health. The Black Report: A Summary and Comment , 1982, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[9]  Mike Roworth Geographical and Environmental Epidemiology: Methods for Small-Area Studies , 1993 .

[10]  J. Edwards THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS. , 1964, Bulletin der Schweizerischen Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften.

[11]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Inequalities in low birth weight: parental social class, area deprivation, and "lone mother" status. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[12]  V. Carstairs,et al.  Deprivation and health in Scotland. , 1990, Health bulletin.

[13]  J. L. Grand,et al.  Inequalities in health: Some international comparisons , 1987 .

[14]  E. Hook,et al.  Maternal cigarette smoking, Down syndrome in live births, and infant race. , 1988, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  M. Werler Teratogen update: smoking and reproductive outcomes. , 1997, Teratology.

[16]  W. Lenz EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS , 1965, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  N. Holtzman,et al.  Maternal cigarette smoking and oral clefts: a population-based study. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[18]  D. Leon,et al.  Influence of birth weight on differences in infant mortality by social class and legitimacy. , 1991, BMJ.

[19]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Perinatal and Infant Mortality and Low Birth Weight among Residents near Cokeworks in Great Britain , 2000, Archives of environmental health.

[20]  D. Stone,et al.  Epidemiology of facial clefts. , 1987, Archives of disease in childhood.

[21]  G. Shaw,et al.  Socioeconomic status, neighborhood social conditions, and neural tube defects. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[22]  R. McCarter,et al.  White-black differences in cardiovascular malformations in infancy and socioeconomic factors. The Baltimore-Washington Infant Study Group. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  L. de Jong-van den Berg,et al.  Periconceptional folic acid in The Netherlands in 1995. Socioeconomic differences. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[24]  A. Ericson,et al.  The Incidence of Congenital Malformations in Various Socioeconomic Groups in Sweden , 1984, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[25]  K. Hemminki,et al.  Congenital malformations by the parental occupation in finland , 1980, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[26]  J. Olsen,et al.  Social Differences in Reproductive Health , 1993, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.