Dissociation of the distance effect and size effect in one-digit numbers

Magnitude comparison of single digits is robustly characterized by a distance effect (close numbers are more difficult to compare than numbers further apart) and a size effect (for a given distance, comparison difficulty increases with increasing size). The distance effect indicates access to the mental number line (Dehaene, 1997), and the size effect is usually interpreted as indicating that the mental number line represents larger numbers more vaguely than smaller ones. In contrast, we have argued earlier (Verguts, Fias, & Stevens, 2005) that for symbolic numbers (Arabic or verbal notation), the size effect does not originate from the mental number line but, instead, originates from mappings to relevant output components that are specific for magnitude comparison. If the latter is true, it should be possible to dissociate the distance effect from the size effect in tasks other than magnitude comparison. In two experiments, we observed a robust distance effect insame/different judgments, which implies access to the mental number line. Yet the size effect was absent. Consistent with our prediction, this finding establishes a dissociation between the size effect and the distance effect.

[1]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Susan Carey,et al.  Cognitive Foundations of Arithmetic: Evolution and Ontogenisis , 2001 .

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words , 1992, Cognition.

[4]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Gardner,et al.  USING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS , 1987, The Lancet.

[6]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[7]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Two-digit comparison: decomposed, holistic, or hybrid? , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[8]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[9]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line , 1999, Cognition.

[10]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[11]  S. Hale,et al.  Global Processing-Time Coefficients Characterize Individual and Group Differences in Cognitive Speed , 1994 .

[12]  W. Schwarz,et al.  On the temporal dynamics of digit comparison processes , 1998 .

[13]  The mental number line: exact and approximate , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  An encoding-complex view of cognitive number processing: Comment on McCloskey, Sokol, and Goodman (1986). , 1988 .

[16]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Automatic stimulus-response associations may be semantically mediated , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Author’s Response: Is Number Sense a Patchwork? , 2001 .

[18]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[19]  S Dehaene,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.