Lidar Measurement Bias Estimation via Return Waveform Modelling in a Context of 3D Mapping

In a context of 3D mapping, it is very important to obtain accurate measurements from sensors. In particular, Light Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) measurements are typically treated as a zero-mean Gaussian distribution. We show that this assumption leads to predictable localisation drifts, especially when a bias related to measuring obstacles with high incidence angles is not taken into consideration. Moreover, we present a way to physically understand and model this bias, which generalizes to multiple sensors. Using an experimental setup, we measured the bias of the Sick LMS151, Velodyne HDL-32E, and Robosense RS-LiDAR-16 as a function of depth and incidence angle, and showed that the bias can reach 20 cm for high incidence angles. We then used our model to remove the bias from the measurements, leading to more accurate maps and a reduced localisation drift.

[1]  R. Siegwart,et al.  Noise characterization of depth sensors for surface inspections , 2012, 2012 2nd International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry (CARPI).

[2]  Scott E. Budge,et al.  Simulation and modeling of return waveforms from a ladar beam footprint in USU LadarSIM , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  Ali Adnan Al-Temeemy The Development of a 3D LADAR Simulator Based on a Fast Target Impulse Response Generation Approach , 2017 .

[4]  Man,et al.  PROBABILISTIC MODEL OF LASER RANGE FINDER FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL GRID CELL IN CLOSE RANGE ENVIRONMENT , 2016 .

[5]  Martial Hebert,et al.  3D measurements from imaging laser radars: how good are they? , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[6]  Antonio Reina,et al.  Characterization of a radial laser scanner for mobile robot navigation , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications. IROS '97.

[7]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Comparing ICP variants on real-world data sets , 2013, Auton. Robots.

[8]  M. Menenti,et al.  Scanning geometry: Influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points , 2011 .

[9]  Javier Roca-Pardiñas,et al.  Analysis of the influence of range and angle of incidence of terrestrial laser scanning measurements on tunnel inspection , 2014 .

[10]  Alexander Bucksch,et al.  Error budget of terrestrial laser scanning: inuence of the incidence angle on the scan quality , 2007 .

[11]  John Ryan Kidd,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Velodyne VLP-16 System for Surface Feature Surveying , 2017 .

[12]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Error modelling, calibration and analysis of an AM–CW terrestrial laser scanner system , 2007 .

[13]  Cang Ye,et al.  Characterization of a 2D laser scanner for mobile robot obstacle negotiation , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[14]  Tsz-Ho Kwok,et al.  DNSS: Dual-Normal-Space Sampling for 3-D ICP Registration , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[15]  K. Kraus,et al.  FROM SINGLE-PULSE TO FULL-WAVEFORM AIRBORNE LASER SCANNERS: POTENTIAL AND PRACTICAL CHALLENGES , 2004 .

[16]  Lujia Wang,et al.  Characterization of a RS-LiDAR for 3D Perception , 2017, 2018 IEEE 8th Annual International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER).

[17]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Incidence angle influence on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points , 2009 .

[18]  Cang Ye,et al.  Characterization of the Hokuyo URG-04LX laser rangefinder for mobile robot obstacle negotiation , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[19]  Stergios I. Roumeliotis,et al.  Weighted range sensor matching algorithms for mobile robot displacement estimation , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[20]  Joewono Widjaja,et al.  Laser range finder using Gaussian beam range equation , 2010 .