A Novel Antibacterial Modification Treatment of Titanium Capable to Improve Osseointegration

Background Among the different causes of orthopedic and dental implant failure, infection remains the most serious and devastating complication associated with biomaterial devices. Purpose The aim of this study was to develop an innovative osteointegrative and antibacterial biomimetic coating on titanium and to perform a chemical-physical and in vitro biological characterization of the coating using the SAOS-2 cell line. We also studied the antibacterial properties of the coating against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria strains. Methods An electrochemical solution containing silicon, calcium, phosphorous, sodium, and silver nanoparticles was used to obtain the antibacterial by Anodic Spark Deposition (ASD) treatment. Surface morphology was characterized using SEM and laser profilometry A qualitative analysis of the chemical composition of the coating was assessed by EDS. The adhesion properties of the coating to the titanium bulk were performed with a 3-point bending test. SAOS-2 osteoblastic cell line spreading and morphology and viability were investigated. The bacterial adhesion and the antibacterial properties were investigated after 3 h and 24 h of incubation with Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus epidermidis, and Escherichia coli bacterial strains. Results The proposed anodization treatment created a chemically and morphologically modified, adherent titanium oxide layer, characterized by a microporous morphology enriched by calcium, silicon, phosphorous, and silver. The preliminary biological characterization showed optimal SAOS-2 cell adhesion and proliferation as well as a strong antibacterial effect. Conclusions Based on the results of this study, we believe that this novel biomimetic and antibacterial treatment hold promise for enhancing osteointegration while conferring strong antibacterial properties to titanium.

[1]  Dennis Maki,et al.  Effect of a Second-Generation Venous Catheter Impregnated with Chlorhexidine and Silver Sulfadiazine on Central CatheterRelated Infections , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  A. Cigada,et al.  A Novel Silicon-Based Electrochemical Treatment to Improve Osteointegration of Titanium Implants , 2013, Journal of applied biomaterials & functional materials.

[3]  L. Visai,et al.  Electrochemical Surface Modification of Titanium for Implant Abutments can Affect Oral Bacteria Contamination , 2008 .

[4]  L. Visai,et al.  Titanium Oxide Antibacterial Surfaces in Biomedical Devices , 2011, The International journal of artificial organs.

[5]  M. Rai,et al.  Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. , 2009, Biotechnology advances.

[6]  A. Singh,et al.  Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review , 2009 .

[7]  K. Neoh,et al.  Antibacterial and mechanical properties of bone cement impregnated with chitosan nanoparticles. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[8]  Buddy D. Ratner,et al.  Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine , 1996 .

[9]  A. Cigada,et al.  Osteointegration of Titanium and Its Alloys by Anodic Spark Deposition and other Electrochemical Techniques: A Review , 2003 .

[10]  A. Porter Nanoscale characterization of the interface between bone and hydroxyapatite implants and the effect of silicon on bone apposition. , 2006, Micron.

[11]  L. Visai,et al.  Decreased Bacterial Adhesion to Surface-Treated Titanium , 2005, The International journal of artificial organs.

[12]  Y. Missirlis,et al.  Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. , 2004, European cells & materials.

[13]  P. Tam,et al.  Silver nanoparticles: partial oxidation and antibacterial activities , 2007, JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry.

[14]  K. Tsuruda,et al.  Antibacterial effect of silver-zeolite on oral bacteria under anaerobic conditions. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  P. Layrolle,et al.  Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  Lingzhou Zhao,et al.  Antibacterial coatings on titanium implants. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[17]  Carla Renata Arciola,et al.  The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[18]  Anfeng Wang,et al.  Influence of silicone surface roughness and hydrophobicity on adhesion and colonization of Staphylococcus epidermidis. , 2009, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A.

[19]  M. Yousefpour,et al.  The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium , 2012, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[20]  A. Lansdown,et al.  A Pharmacological and Toxicological Profile of Silver as an Antimicrobial Agent in Medical Devices , 2010, Advances in pharmacological sciences.

[21]  Helmut Münstedt,et al.  The antimicrobial efficacy of polyamide 6/silver-nano- and microcomposites , 2008 .

[22]  M. Kiremitci-Gumusderelioglu,et al.  Microbial adhesion to ionogenic PHEMA, PU and PP implants. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[23]  Makarand V Risbud,et al.  Chitosan: a versatile biopolymer for orthopaedic tissue-engineering. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[24]  Byong-Taek Lee,et al.  Initial biocompatibility and enhanced osteoblast response of Si doping in a porous BCP bone graft substitute , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[25]  Alexander M Seifalian,et al.  Nanosilver as a new generation of nanoproduct in biomedical applications. , 2010, Trends in biotechnology.

[26]  H. Autrup,et al.  PVP-coated silver nanoparticles and silver ions induce reactive oxygen species, apoptosis and necrosis in THP-1 monocytes. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[27]  M Navarro,et al.  Biomaterials in orthopaedics , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[29]  L. F. Gorup,et al.  eview he growing importance of materials that prevent microbial adhesion : ntimicrobial effect of medical devices containing silver ouglas , 2009 .

[30]  Seong‐Hyeon Hong,et al.  Antibacterial properties of Ag (or Pt)-containing calcium phosphate coatings formed by micro-arc oxidation. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[31]  L. Visai,et al.  Antibacterial Activity of Zinc Modified Titanium Oxide Surface , 2006, The International journal of artificial organs.

[32]  Xi Jiang,et al.  Biomimetic CaP coating incorporated with parathyroid hormone improves the osseointegration of titanium implant , 2012, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[33]  C. Aparicio,et al.  In vivo evaluation of micro-rough and bioactive titanium dental implants using histometry and pull-out tests. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[34]  G. Blunn,et al.  The osteoinductivity of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  R. Surampalli,et al.  The inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles, silver ions, and silver chloride colloids on microbial growth. , 2008, Water research.

[36]  Yoshiki Oshida,et al.  Dental Implant Systems , 2010, International journal of molecular sciences.

[37]  M. Šlouf,et al.  Surface-enhanced Raman scattering from a single molecularly bridged silver nanoparticle aggregate , 2009 .