Optimizing and validating an approach for identifying glaucomatous change in optic nerve topography.

PURPOSE To determine and validate optimal parameters for analysis in a previously described approach for identifying glaucomatous optic nerve progression by scanning laser tomography. METHODS Thirty-degree sectors of rim area, as defined by an experimental reference plane, were analyzed for change with respect to different statistical limits of variability (80%, 90%, 95%, 98%, 99%, and 99.9%) in the longitudinal image series of 62 eyes from 30 ocular hypertension converters and 32 normal control subjects. A criterion requiring that change is repeatable in two of three consecutive tests (the 2-of-3 criterion) was compared with a single-test strategy not requiring confirmation, and four other plausible criteria. The influence of these various parameters on sensitivity and the false-positive rate was evaluated. The same series were also assessed for change by the known method of computer-generated probability maps. RESULTS More sectors were identified as progressing in converter eyes than in control eyes at every limit of variability. With stricter limits of variability and a requirement of confirmation, fewer sectors were identified as changing, especially in control eyes. The 2-of-3 criterion had the most favorably balanced sensitivity and false-positive rates: these were, for the 90% limit of variability, 90.0% and 6.2%, respectively, and for the 95% limit, 83.3% and 3.1%, respectively. Confirmed rim loss in converter eyes was most frequent in the disc poles and corresponded with the field hemisphere of conversion in 80%. Probability maps detected significant and repeatable change in 26 (86.7%) of 30 converter eyes and 14 (43.8%) of 32 of control eyes. CONCLUSIONS This study was conducted to optimize and validate an approach for identifying progression. The method distinguished eyes with glaucomatous change from unchanging control eyes.

[1]  P J Airaksinen,et al.  Initial glaucomatous optic disk and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and their progression. , 1991, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[3]  H A Quigley,et al.  Change in the Optic Disc and Nerve Fiber Layer Estimated with the Glaucoma‐Scope in Monkey Eyes , 1996, Journal of glaucoma.

[4]  G A Cioffi,et al.  Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[5]  Reference plane definition and reproducibility in optic nerve head images. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  J. Jonas,et al.  Pattern of glaucomatous neuroretinal rim loss. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[7]  R. T. Hart,et al.  Deformation of the lamina cribrosa and anterior scleral canal wall in early experimental glaucoma. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  A C Viswanathan,et al.  Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  B. Chauhan,et al.  Effect of intraocular pressure on optic disc topography, electroretinography, and axonal loss in a chronic pressure-induced rat model of optic nerve damage. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Philip P. Chen,et al.  Detection of Optic Disc Changes with Glaucoma‐Scope Probability Maps , 1998, Journal of glaucoma.

[11]  R. P. Mills,et al.  Probability Maps of Sequential Glaucoma‐Scope Images Help Identify Significant Change , 1997, Journal of glaucoma.

[12]  Roger A. Hitchings,et al.  Validity of Rim Area Measurements by Different Reference Planes , 2004, Journal of glaucoma.

[13]  D. R. Anderson,et al.  Clinical recognition of glaucomatous cupping. , 1973, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  A E Maumenee,et al.  Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss. I. Methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  D. R. Anderson,et al.  The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. , 1980, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  H. Thompson,et al.  Change detection in regional and volumetric disc parameters using longitudinal confocal scanning laser tomography. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[17]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Technique for detecting serial topographic changes in the optic disc and peripapillary retina using scanning laser tomography. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  K Rohrschneider,et al.  Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[19]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  J Caprioli,et al.  Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  M Schulzer,et al.  Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[22]  R N Weinreb,et al.  Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. , 1991, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Magnification Changes in Scanning Laser Tomography , 2004, Journal of glaucoma.

[24]  Roger A Hitchings,et al.  Approach for identifying glaucomatous optic nerve progression by scanning laser tomography. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  R. Hitchings,et al.  Interpreting glaucoma progression by white-on-white perimetry , 2002, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[26]  Jon C. Ervin,et al.  Clinician change detection viewing longitudinal stereophotographs compared to confocal scanning laser tomography in the LSU Experimental Glaucoma (LEG) Study. , 2002, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[27]  F W Fitzke,et al.  Use of sequential Heidelberg retina tomograph images to identify changes at the optic disc in ocular hypertensive patients at risk of developing glaucoma , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  A. Tuulonen,et al.  Rate and pattern of neuroretinal rim area decrease in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[29]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Reasons for rim area variability in scanning laser tomography. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.