A lexicon for wear of metal‐on‐metal hip prostheses

Research on metal‐on‐metal (MoM) hip bearings has generated an extensive vocabulary to describe the wear processes and resultant surface damage. However, a lack of consistency and some redundancy exist in the current terminology. To facilitate the understanding of MoM tribology and to enhance communication of results among researchers and clinicians, we propose four categories of wear terminology: wear modes refer to the in vivo conditions under which the wear occurred; wear mechanisms refer to fundamental wear processes (adhesion, abrasion, fatigue, and tribochemical reactions); wear damage refers to the resultant changes in the morphology and/or composition of the surfaces; and wear features refer to the specific wear phenomena that are described in terms of the relevant modes, mechanisms, and damage. Clarifying examples are presented, but it is expected that terms will be added to the lexicon as new mechanisms and types of damage are identified. Corrosion refers to electrochemical processes that can remove or add material and thus also generate damage. Corrosion can act alone or may interact with mechanical wear. Examples of corrosion damage are also presented. However, an in‐depth discussion of the many types of corrosion and their effects is beyond the scope of the present wear lexicon. © 2014 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 32:1221–1233, 2014.

[1]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Influence of head size on the development of metallic wear and on the characteristics of carbon layers in metal-on-metal hip joints , 2009, Acta orthopaedica.

[2]  F. Haddad,et al.  Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  J. Charnley,et al.  The nine and ten year results of the low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. , 1973, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Wear mechanisms in metal‐on‐metal bearings: The importance of tribochemical reaction layers , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  R. Streicher,et al.  [The wear behavior of capsules and heads of CoCrMo casts in long-term implanted all-metal hip prostheses]. , 1989, Der Orthopade.

[6]  Sue Leurgans,et al.  A Multicenter Retrieval Study of the Taper Interfaces of Modular Hip Prostheses , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  I. Clarke,et al.  Current concepts of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[8]  U. Wyss,et al.  Metasul : a metal-on-metal bearing , 1999 .

[9]  P. Campbell,et al.  Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  G. Reinisch,et al.  Retrieval study of uncemented metal-metal hip prostheses revised for early loosening. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[11]  P. Campbell,et al.  Failure modes of 433 metal-on-metal hip implants: how, why, and wear. , 2011, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[12]  C. Rieker,et al.  Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  J L Gilbert,et al.  In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations. The effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  P. Noble,et al.  Understanding why metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties fail: a comparison between patients with well-functioning and revised birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasties. AAOS exhibit selection. , 2012, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume.

[15]  Alan M Kop,et al.  Corrosion of a hip stem with a modular neck taper junction: a retrieval study of 16 cases. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  G K McKee,et al.  Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar prosthesis. , 1966, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  P. Cann,et al.  Retrieval analysis of 240 metal-on-metal hip components, comparing modular total hip replacement with hip resurfacing. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  Andrej Cör,et al.  Survivorship and retrieval analysis of Sikomet metal-on-metal total hip replacements at a mean of seven years. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  R. Chiesa,et al.  In Vivo Wear of 3 Types of Metal on Metal Hip Prostheses During 2 Decades of Use , 1996 .

[20]  P. Campbell,et al.  Immune responses correlate with serum-metal in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  P. Pynsent,et al.  Metal on Metal Surface Replacement of the Hip: Experience of the McMinn Prosthesis , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  H. Mckellop,et al.  In vivo wear of titanium-alloy hip prostheses. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  Harry A McKellop,et al.  The lexicon of polyethylene wear in artificial joints. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[24]  U. Wyss,et al.  Clinical Wear Performance of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties , 1998 .

[25]  Matthias Scherge,et al.  Microstructure of tribologically induced nanolayers produced at ultra-low wear rates , 2007 .

[26]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Tribochemical reaction on metal-on-metal hip joint bearings A comparison between in-vitro and in-vivo results , 2003 .

[27]  W. Remagen,et al.  [On the problem of osteolysis]. , 1967, Frankfurter Zeitschrift fur Pathologie.