Agent-Centred Approach for Assuring Ethics in Dependable Service Systems

As the world enters the information era, more and more dependable services controlling and even making our decisions are moved to the ubiquitous smart devices. While various standards are in place to impose the societal ethical norms on decision-making of those devices, the rights of the individuals to satisfy their own moral norms are not addressed with the same scrutiny. Hence, the right of the individuals to reason on their own and evaluate morality of certain decisions is at stake. In this work we propose an agent-centred approach for assuring ethics in dependable technological service systems. We build upon assurance of safety and security and propose the notion of ethics assurance case as a way to assure that individual users have been made aware of all the ethically challenging decisions that might be performed or enabled by the service provider. We propose a framework for identifying and categorising ethically challenging decisions, and documenting the ethics assurance case. We apply the framework on an illustrative example.

[1]  D. Forsyth A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. , 1980 .

[2]  Sjouke Mauw,et al.  Foundations of Attack Trees , 2005, ICISC.

[3]  Mircea Georgescu,et al.  INTERNET OF THINGS – SOME ETHICAL ISSUES , 2013 .

[4]  Frank Swiderski,et al.  Threat Modeling , 2018, Hacking Connected Cars.

[5]  Michael K Paasche-Orlow,et al.  Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Thomson Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. , 1976, The Monist.

[7]  Robert J. Ellison,et al.  Attack Trees , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[8]  Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic,et al.  Ethics Aspects of Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference.

[9]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  P. Brey,et al.  Anticipating ethical issues in emerging IT , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[11]  H. Jonas The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age , 1985 .

[12]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Autonomous Vehicles Need Experimental Ethics: Are We Ready for Utilitarian Cars? , 2015, ArXiv.

[14]  Peter G. Bishop,et al.  Safety and Assurance Cases: Past, Present and Possible Future - an Adelard Perspective , 2010, SSS.

[15]  Tim Kelly,et al.  Arguing Safety - A Systematic Approach to Managing Safety Cases , 1998 .

[16]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Hazard Analysis of Complex Spacecraft Using Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis , 2014 .

[17]  Ricardo Neisse,et al.  Ethical Design in the Internet of Things , 2016, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[18]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Moral Decision Making in Autonomous Systems: Enforcement, Moral Emotions, Dignity, Trust, and Deception , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Richard Kissel,et al.  Glossary of Key Information Security Terms , 2014 .

[20]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Fundamentals of service science , 2008 .

[21]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Toward Ethical Information Systems: The Contribution of Discourse Ethics , 2010, MIS Q..

[22]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .

[23]  Paul Ohm Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization , 2009 .

[24]  Michael Fisher,et al.  Formal verification of ethical choices in autonomous systems , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..