Common Core Science Standards: Implications for Students with Learning Disabilities

The Common Core Science Standards represent a new effort to increase science learning for all students. These standards include a focus on English and language arts aspects of science learning, and three dimensions of science standards, including practices of science, crosscutting concepts of science, and disciplinary core ideas in the various subject areas. Many of these issues bring important implications for students with learning disabilities, which we discuss in turn. With appropriate supports and applications, students with learning disabilities can potentially benefit greatly from these new standards. However, the demands of these standards may require a higher level of support than those commonly available for many students with learning disabilities.

[1]  Jennie Hall,et al.  THE TEACHING OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD. , 1934, Science.

[2]  Frederick J. Brigham,et al.  Science Education and Students with Learning Disabilities , 2011 .

[3]  T. Scruggs,et al.  The Effectiveness of Mnemonic Instruction for Students with Learning and Behavior Problems: An Update and Research Synthesis , 2000 .

[4]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Scientific Reasoning of Students with Mild Mental Retardation: Investigating Preconceptions and Conceptual Change. , 1994 .

[5]  Laura Hedin,et al.  Reading Science Text: Challenges for Students with Learning Disabilities and Considerations for Teachers , 2011 .

[6]  Patrick McGuinn,et al.  No Child Left Behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy, 1965-2005 , 2006 .

[7]  Jeffrey P. Bakken,et al.  READING COMPREHENSION OF EXPOSITORY SCIENCE MATERIAL AND STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES: A COMPARISON OF STRATEGIES , 1997 .

[8]  R. Kozma.  The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding , 2003 .

[9]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Reasoning and Remembering , 1995 .

[10]  Joseph R. Boyle,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Notetaking on the Recall and Comprehension of Lecture Information for High School Students with Learning Disabilities. , 2001 .

[11]  Jeffrey P. Bakken,et al.  Reading Versus Doing: The Relative Effects of Textbook-Based and Inquiry-Oriented Approaches to Science Learning in Special Education Classrooms , 1993 .

[12]  Moira Konrad,et al.  Using Guided Notes to Enhance Instruction for All Students , 2011 .

[13]  Joseph D. Novak.  At Purdue University , 1965 .

[14]  Frederick J. Brigham,et al.  Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders and Their Teachers in Test-Linked Systems of Accountability , 2000 .

[15]  John R. Staver,et al.  Science Instruction for the Mildly Handicapped: Direct Instruction versus Discovery Teaching. , 1992 .

[16]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Text Versus Hands-On Science Curriculum , 1994 .

[17]  Amy E Barth,et al.  Response to Intervention for Middle School Students With Reading Difficulties: Effects of a Primary and Secondary Intervention , 2010, School psychology review.

[18]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Promoting Relational Thinking: Elaborative Interrogation for Students with Mild Disabilities , 1994 .

[19]  Harry P. Hatry,et al.  Elementary and secondary education , 1989 .

[20]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[21]  Steve Graham,et al.  Powerful Writing Strategies for All Students , 2007 .

[22]  J. Levin,et al.  Learning-Disabled Students’ Memory for Expository Prose: Mnemonic Versus Nonmnemonic Pictures , 1987 .

[23]  D. Carnine,et al.  Teaching Complex Content to Learning Disabled Students: The Role of Technology , 1989, Exceptional children.

[24]  Richard T. Boon,et al.  Correlates of Inquiry Learning in Science , 2001 .

[25]  Frederick J. Brigham,et al.  An exploration of the use of eye‐gaze tracking to study problem‐solving on standardized science assessments , 2006 .

[26]  R. Ferretti,et al.  On Defending Controversial Viewpoints: Debates of Sixth Graders about the Desirability of Early 20th-Century American Immigration. , 2002 .

[27]  T. Scruggs,et al.  HOW EFFECTIVE IS INQUIRY LEARNING FOR STUDENTS WITH MILD DISABILITIES? , 1997 .

[28]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Science Learning in Special Education: The Case for Constructed Versus Instructed Learning , 2007 .

[29]  Gary Sykes,et al.  Handbook of Education Policy Research. , 2009 .

[30]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Differentiated Curriculum Enhancement in Inclusive Middle School Science , 2006 .

[31]  Frederick J. Brigham.  Teacher enthusiasm in learning disabilities classrooms: Effects on learning and behavior. , 1992 .

[32]  Rodger W. Bybee,et al.  The Teaching of Science: 21st-Century Perspectives , 2010 .

[33]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  The Construction of Scientific Knowledge by Students with Mild Disabilities , 1994 .

[34]  L. Maheady,et al.  Classwide Peer Tutoring: Practice, Theory, Research, and Personal Narrative , 2010 .

[35]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Do Special Education Interventions Improve Learning of Secondary Content? A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[36]  Frederick J. Brigham,et al.  Navigating the Measurement and Monitoring Maze , 2012 .

[37]  Janet W. Lerner,et al.  Learning Disabilities and Related Mild Disabilities: Characteristics, Teaching Strategies, and New Directions , 1994 .

[38]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Cognition and Learning in Inclusive High School Chemistry Classes , 2005 .

[39]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[40]  Panayota Mantzicopoulos,et al.  “A place where living things affect and depend on each other”: Qualitative and quantitative outcomes associated with inclusive science teaching , 1998 .

[41]  L. Groves.  A differentiated curriculum , 2012 .

[42]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Teacher Perceptions of Mainstreaming/Inclusion, 1958–1995: A Research Synthesis , 1996 .

[43]  Douglas D. Dexter,et al.  A Meta‐Analytic Review of Graphic Organizers and Science Instruction for Adolescents with Learning Disabilities: Implications for the Intermediate and Secondary Science Classroom , 2011 .

[44]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  The Inclusive Classroom: Strategies for Effective Differentiated Instruction , 2009 .

[45]  Meryl W. Bertenthal,et al.  Uncommon Measures: Equivalence and Linkage among Educational Tests. , 1999 .

[46]  Gerald Tindal,et al.  Teaching the Scientific Method to At-Risk Students and Students with Learning Disabilities Through Concept Anchoring and Explicit Instruction , 1999 .