Evaluation of activity monitors in manual wheelchair users with paraplegia

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of SenseWear® (SW) and RT3 activity monitors (AMs) in estimating energy expenditure (EE) in manual wheelchair users (MWUs) with paraplegia for a variety of physical activities. Methods: Twenty-four subjects completed four activities including resting, wheelchair propulsion, arm-ergometry exercise, and deskwork. The criterion EE was measured by a K4b2 portable metabolic cart. The EE estimated by the SW and RT3 were compared with the criterion EE by the absolute differences and absolute percentage errors. Intraclass correlations and the Bland and Altman plots were also used to assess the agreements between the two AMs and the metabolic cart. Correlations between the criterion EE and the estimated EE and sensors data from the AMs were evaluated. Results: The EE estimation errors for the AMs varied from 24.4 to 125.8% for the SW and from 22.0 to 52.8% for the RT3. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the criterion EE and the EE estimated by the two AMs for each activity and all activities as a whole were considered poor with all the ICCs smaller than 0.75. Except for deskwork, the EE from the SW was more correlated to the criterion EE than the EE from the RT3. Conclusion: The results indicate that neither of the AMs is an appropriate tool for quantifying physical activity in MWUs with paraplegia. However, the accuracy of EE estimation could be potentially improved by building new regression models based on wheelchair-related activities.

[1]  J. Mitchell,et al.  THE PHYSIOLOGY OF EXERCISE. , 1965, Scientific American.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[3]  D. Koh,et al.  Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. , 1989, Computers in biology and medicine.

[4]  G. Borg.  Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[5]  R. Cooper,et al.  Wheelchairs and seating , 1994 .

[6]  K. Patrick,et al.  Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine , 1995 .

[7]  P. Williams,et al.  Physical activity and public health. , 1995, JAMA.

[8]  Bradley N. Hedrick,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of physical activity in university graduates with locomotor disabilities , 1997, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[9]  R. Washburn,et al.  Assessing Physical Activity during Wheelchair Pushing: Validity of a Portable Accelerometer , 1999 .

[10]  A. Dunn,et al.  Variables related to meeting the CDC/ACSM physical activity guidelines. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 Portable Metabolic System , 2001, International journal of sports medicine.

[12]  M Akai,et al.  Energy expenditure during walking with weight-bearing control (WBC) orthosis in thoracic level of paraplegic patients , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[13]  Thomas Reilly,et al.  Estimating Human Energy Expenditure , 2003, Sports medicine.

[14]  A. Buchholz,et al.  Energy expenditure in chronic spinal cord injury , 2004, Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

[15]  B Dawson,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of a Cosmed K4b2 portable gas analysis system. , 2004, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[16]  M. Marcus,et al.  Evaluation of the SenseWear Pro Armband to assess energy expenditure during exercise. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  B. Belza,et al.  Actigraphy as a Measure of Physical Activity for Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury , 2004, Nursing research.

[18]  C. Warms.  Physical Activity Measurement in Persons With Chronic and Disabling Conditions: Methods, Strategies, and Issues , 2006, Family & community health.

[19]  Chantal Simon,et al.  Physical Activity‐Related Energy Expenditure With the RT3 and TriTrac Accelerometers in Overweight Adults , 2007, Obesity.

[20]  David Andre,et al.  Recent Advances in Free-Living Physical Activity Monitoring: A Review , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[21]  M. Boninger,et al.  Assessing mobility characteristics and activity levels of manual wheelchair users. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  The development of a nationwide registry of wheelchair users , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[23]  David B Allison,et al.  Evaluation of a portable device to measure daily energy expenditure in free-living adults. , 2007, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[24]  B. Fernhall,et al.  Health Implications of Physical Activity in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Literature Review , 2008, Journal of health and human services administration.

[25]  T. Abel,et al.  Energy expenditure in ball games for wheelchair users , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[26]  Leena Choi,et al.  Validity of Physical Activity Intensity Predictions by ActiGraph, Actical, and RT3 Accelerometers , 2008, Obesity.

[27]  J. Eng,et al.  Physical activity is related to lower levels of pain, fatigue and depression in individuals with spinal-cord injury: a correlational study , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[28]  W. E. Langbein,et al.  Energy cost of physical activities in persons with spinal cord injury. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.