Research to practice: Using research findings to inform the first-year engineering experience

Meaningful experiences in the first year of an engineering curriculum are known to motivate students and help student retention in engineering. On-going research in the School of Engineering is aimed at understanding the formation of an engineering identity in students, as well as classifying and assessing problem-based learning practices embodied throughout the curriculum. Investigations were conducted with the inaugural freshman engineering class using interviews, surveys, and focus groups. Analyses of the collected data provided beneficial insight into students' formative exposure to engineering, attitudes toward engineering, and learning experiences with the Introduction to Engineering course. Key findings from this data were then used to implement enhancements to the freshman engineering experience for our students. This paper describes how results of these research activities have been incorporated into practices within the engineering program. More specifically, how the findings were used to incorporate a focus on the profession in the Introduction to Engineering course, guide the creation of a new engineering seminar course, and supplement the freshman advising process. The types of changes implemented herein are relevant to introductory freshman engineering courses nationwide and across specific disciplines.

[1]  M. Ohland,et al.  The Impact of a Discipline‐Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention , 1998 .

[2]  Richard L. Porter,et al.  A new "contact-based" first year engineering course , 1997, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change.

[3]  Olga Pierrakos,et al.  Incorporating Problem Based Learning (Pbl) In A Freshman Engineering Course: Methods For Classifying And Assessing Pbl Projects , 2010 .

[4]  Helen L. Chen,et al.  Being and Becoming: Gender and Identity Formation of Engineering Students. Research Brief. , 2008 .

[5]  Olga Pierrakos,et al.  Gender differences in freshman engineering students' identification with engineering , 2010, 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[6]  Maher Rizkalla,et al.  Developing A Motivational Freshman Course In Using The Principle Of Attached Learning , 1999 .

[7]  Bruce Carlson,et al.  A Motivational First‐year Electronics Lab Course , 1997 .

[8]  Aditya Johri,et al.  On the development of a professional identity: engineering persisters vs engineering switchers , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[9]  P. Wankat,et al.  The Effects of an Orientation Course on the Attitudes of Freshmen Engineering Students , 1998 .

[10]  Nikos J Mourtos,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of an introductory engineering course for freshmen , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[11]  D. Raj Raman,et al.  The Engage Program: Implementing and Assessing a New First Year Experience at the University of Tennessee , 2002 .

[12]  H. Diefes-Dux,et al.  Relative effectiveness of different first-year engineering seminars , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[13]  Cristina H. Amon,et al.  Systematic Design of a First‐Year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University , 1997 .

[14]  Sandra Courter,et al.  From the Students' Point of View: Experiences in a Freshman Engineering Design Course , 1998 .

[15]  B. Olds,et al.  The Effect of a First‐Year Integrated Engineering Curriculum on Graduation Rates and Student Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study , 2004 .