Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.

The identification of targets in visual search arrays may be improved by suppressing competing information from the surrounding distractor items. The present study provided evidence that this hypothetical filtering process has a neural correlate, the "N2pc" component of the event-related potential waveform. The N2pc was observed when a target item was surrounded by competing distractor items but was absent when the array could be rejected as a nontarget on the basis of simple feature information. In addition, the N2pc was eliminated when filtering was discouraged by removing the distractor items, making the distractors relevant, or making all items within an array identical. Combined with previous topographic analyses, these results suggest that attentional filtering occurs in occipital cortex under the control of feedback from higher cortical regions after a preliminary feature-based analysis of the stimulus array.

[1]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[2]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention , 1993 .

[3]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  J Wilson,et al.  Spatial Frequency and Selective Attention to Local and Global Information , 1987, Perception.

[6]  C. Gross.  7 – The Neural Basis of Stimulus Equivalence Across Retinal Translation , 1977 .

[7]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Preattentive processing in vision , 1985, Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Positron emission tomographic measurements of pulvinar activity during an attention task , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Ivry,et al.  Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[12]  Geoffrey E. Hinton.  A Parallel Computation that Assigns Canonical Object-Based Frames of Reference , 1981, IJCAI.

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  Attentional control of visual perception: cortical and subcortical mechanisms. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[14]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[16]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  C. C. Wood,et al.  The ɛ-Adjustment Procedure for Repeated-Measures Analyses of Variance , 1976 .

[18]  Bela Julesz,et al.  Enhanced detection in the aperture of focal attention during simple discrimination tasks , 1986, Nature.

[19]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Open questions about computation in cerebral cortex , 1986 .

[20]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[21]  S. Luck.  Cognitive and neural mechanisms of visual search , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  S. Luck,et al.  The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: an electrophysiological analysis. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[23]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .

[24]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[26]  R T Knight,et al.  Cortical substrates supporting visual search in humans. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  E. Donchin,et al.  Psychophysiology : systems, processes, and applications , 1987 .

[29]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  Connectionist Models and Their Properties , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  R. Näätänen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[31]  Leslie S. Prichep,et al.  Machinery of the Mind , 1990 .

[32]  J. Beck.  Perceptual grouping produced by line figures , 1967 .

[33]  J. Fuster,et al.  Inferotemporal neurons distinguish and retain behaviorally relevant features of visual stimuli. , 1981, Science.

[34]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Human and Machine Vision , 1983 .

[35]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Feldman,et al.  Connectionist models and parallelism in high-level vision. Technical report , 1985 .

[37]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[38]  R. Doty,et al.  Lateralization in the nervous system , 1977 .

[39]  C. J. Downing.  Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  S J Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[42]  A. Treisman.  Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[44]  Gerald M. Edelman,et al.  Dynamic aspects of neocortical function , 1984 .

[45]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  O Bertrand,et al.  Scalp current density fields: concept and properties. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[47]  E. Donchin,et al.  Cognitive Psychophysiology and Human Information Processing , 1986 .

[48]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[49]  S J Luck,et al.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[50]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[51]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[53]  S J Luck,et al.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[54]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. , 1994 .

[55]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  The perception of multiple objects , 1991 .

[56]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention-Related Modulation of Sensory-Evoked Brain Activity in a Visual Search Task , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[58]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Luminance-increment detection: capacity-limited or not? , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[60]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[61]  M. Posner,et al.  Does attention affect visual feature integration? , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  H. Hawkins,et al.  Visual attention modulates signal detectability. , 1990 .

[63]  R. Desimone,et al.  Shape recognition and inferior temporal neurons. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[65]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[66]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque , 1979, Brain Research.

[67]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination , 1983, Nature.