A Two-Stage Programming Approach to Fluence Map Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning

The fluence map optimization (FMO) problem is one of the most studied problems in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning. Although many approaches have shown to yield good solutions to the FMO problem, the optimal solutions obtained ensure that the resulting treatment is the best possible with respect to the weighting parameters of the formulation used. Since the ‘optimal’ weighting scheme is unknown, the choice of the weight parameters is typically a long trial-and-error process until a satisfactory solution is achieved. Moreover, for selecting the best irradiating directions, it is not clear how traditional trial-and-error parameter tuning should be incorporated or managed. A two-stage programming approach is proposed to reduce the dependency of the optimal solutions on the weight parameters and simultaneously improve the overall plan quality. This approach is yet another step towards automated generation of treatment plans which will result in breakthrough developments in radiation therapy care.

[1]  Ronald L. Rardin,et al.  Column generation for IMRT cancer therapy optimization with implementable segments , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  Humberto Rocha,et al.  Beam angle optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a guided pattern search method , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  M. Alber,et al.  On the degeneracy of the IMRT optimization problem. , 2002, Medical physics.

[4]  H. Romeijn,et al.  Interior point algorithms: guaranteed optimality for fluence map optimization in IMRT , 2010, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[5]  J. M. Dias,et al.  Discretization of optimal beamlet intensities in IMRT: A binary integer programming approach , 2012, Math. Comput. Model..

[6]  H. Romeijn,et al.  A novel linear programming approach to fluence map optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. , 2003, Medical physics.

[9]  Fernando Alonso,et al.  A new concept for interactive radiotherapy planning with multicriteria optimization: first clinical evaluation. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  H. Romeijn,et al.  A unifying framework for multi-criteria fluence map optimization models. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Maria do Carmo Lopes,et al.  Selection of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment beam directions using radial basis functions within a pattern search methods framework , 2013, J. Glob. Optim..

[12]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  A Column Generation Approach to Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Using Aperture Modulation , 2005, SIAM J. Optim..

[13]  S. Spirou,et al.  A gradient inverse planning algorithm with dose-volume constraints. , 1998, Medical physics.