Flux detectors versus concentration detectors: two types of chemoreceptors.

Dose-response curves relating the external stimulus concentration to receptor occupancy differ in two types of chemoreceptor organs. In 'concentration detectors' the receptor molecules at the receptor cell membrane are directly exposed to the external stimulus concentration; these organs exhibit the well-known hyperbolic dose-response relationship reflecting the association-dissociation of stimulus and receptor molecules. In contrast, 'flux detectors' accumulate the stimulus molecules in a perireceptor compartment. In flux detectors, deactivation of stimulus molecules may be in balance with arrival, as a prerequisite for producing a constant effective stimulus concentration at constant adsorptive flux of stimulus molecules. In a simple model of a flux detector in which receptor molecules themselves catalyze the deactivation, the dose-response relationship is linear. It reflects the rate of stimulus deactivation. If the deactivation is catalyzed by a separate enzyme, the dose-response relationship can be close to hyperbolic, or linear. In all cases, the receptor molecules are maximally occupied if the adsorptive flux equals or exceeds the maximum rate of stimulus deactivation. The time course of the receptor potential recorded from moths' pheromone receptors depends on the odor compound, which suggests that a peripheral process, possibly the stimulus deactivation, is the slowest, rate-limiting process of the transduction cascade. Further evidence comes from experiments with stimuli oversaturating the mechanism responsible for the decline of the receptor potential.

[1]  W. Boos,et al.  Dependence of maltose transport and chemotaxis on the amount of maltose-binding protein. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  G. Kasang,et al.  Enzymatic Conversion and Degradation of Sex Pheromones in Antennae of the Male Silkworm Moth Antheraea polyphemus , 1988 .

[3]  G. Stange Sensory and Behavioural Responses of Terrestrial Invertebrates to Biogenic Carbon Dioxide Gradients , 1996 .

[4]  H. Breer,et al.  Termination of second messenger signaling in olfaction. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  L. Riddiford,et al.  Kinetic properties of a sex pheromone-degrading enzyme: the sensillar esterase of Antheraea polyphemus. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  J. Dickens,et al.  Detection and deactivation of pheromone and plant odor components by the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) , 1993 .

[7]  U. Meyer,et al.  Olfactory-specific cytochrome P-450 (P-450olf1; IIG1). Gene structure and developmental regulation. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  K. Kaissling Structures of odour molecules and multiple activities of receptor cells , 1977 .

[9]  W. E. Carr,et al.  The role of perireceptor events in chemosensory processes , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  L. M. Beidler,et al.  A THEORY OF TASTE STIMULATION , 1954, The Journal of general physiology.

[11]  D. Lancet,et al.  Olfactory-specific cytochrome P-450. cDNA cloning of a novel neuroepithelial enzyme possibly involved in chemoreception. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Perireceptor events in olfaction. , 1996, Journal of neurobiology.

[13]  K. Kaissling,et al.  Interactions of pheromone with moth antennae: Adsorption, desorption and transport , 1985 .

[14]  M. M. Mozell,et al.  A mass transport model of olfaction. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  J. Hildebrand,et al.  Insect Olfaction , 1999, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[16]  K. Persaud,et al.  Binding and metabolism of the urinous odorant 5α-androstan-3-one in sheep olfactory mucosa , 1988 .

[17]  D Schild,et al.  Second messenger signaling in olfactory transduction. , 1996, Journal of neurobiology.

[18]  G. Latta,et al.  Ordinary differential equations and their solutions , 1960 .

[19]  G. Ziegelberger Redox-shift of the pheromone-binding protein in the silkmoth Antheraea polyphemus. , 1995, European journal of biochemistry.

[20]  M. J. Coon,et al.  cDNA and derived amino acid sequence of rabbit nasal cytochrome P450NMb (P450IIG1), a unique isozyme possibly involved in olfaction. , 1991, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[21]  M. Mayer,et al.  Conversion of the Sex Pheromone of the Cabbage Looper , 1973, Nature.

[22]  K. Kaissling,et al.  Kinetic studies of transduction in olfactory receptors of Bombyx mori , 1972 .

[23]  W. E. Carr,et al.  Ectonucleotidase Activities Associated with the Olfactory Organ of the Spiny Lobster , 1990, Journal of neurochemistry.

[24]  H Breer,et al.  Signal recognition and transduction in olfactory neurons. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  K. Kaissling Sensory Transduction in Insect Olfactory Receptors , 1974 .

[26]  T. Silhavy,et al.  On the significance of the retention of ligand by protein. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  W. Roelofs,et al.  Sex pheromone perception: electroantennogram responses of the red-banded leaf roller moth. , 1971, Journal of insect physiology.

[28]  K. Kaissling Antennae and Noses: Their Sensitivities as Molecule Detectors , 1990 .

[29]  A. Dahl The Effect of Cytochrome P-450-Dependent Metabolism and Other Enzyme Activities on Olfaction , 1988 .

[30]  P. Gervasi,et al.  Biotransformation enzymes in nasal mucosa and liver of Sprague-Dawley rats. , 1988, Toxicology letters.

[31]  K. Kaissling Peripheral mechanisms of pheromone reception in moths. , 1996, Chemical senses.

[32]  T. Getchell,et al.  Perireceptor and receptor events in vertebrate olfaction , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.

[33]  K. Kaissling,et al.  Specificity of primary and secondary olfactory processes in Bombyx antennae , 1972 .