Demons deformable registration for CBCT-guided procedures in the head and neck: convergence and accuracy.

PURPOSE The accuracy and convergence behavior of a variant of the Demons deformable registration algorithm were investigated for use in cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided procedures of the head and neck. Online use of deformable registration for guidance of therapeutic procedures such as image-guided surgery or radiation therapy places trade-offs on accuracy and computational expense. This work describes a convergence criterion for Demons registration developed to balance these demands; the accuracy of a multiscale Demons implementation using this convergence criterion is quantified in CBCT images of the head and neck. METHODS Using an open-source "symmetric" Demons registration algorithm, a convergence criterion based on the change in the deformation field between iterations was developed to advance among multiple levels of a multiscale image pyramid in a manner that optimized accuracy and computation time. The convergence criterion was optimized in cadaver studies involving CBCT images acquired using a surgical C-arm prototype modified for 3D intraoperative imaging. CBCT-to-CBCT registration was performed and accuracy was quantified in terms of the normalized cross-correlation (NCC) and target registration error (TRE). The accuracy and robustness of the algorithm were then tested in clinical CBCT images of ten patients undergoing radiation therapy of the head and neck. RESULTS The cadaver model allowed optimization of the convergence factor and initial measurements of registration accuracy: Demons registration exhibited TRE=(0.8+/-0.3) mm and NCC =0.99 in the cadaveric head compared to TRE=(2.6+/-1.0) mm and NCC=0.93 with rigid registration. Similarly for the patient data, Demons registration gave mean TRE=(1.6+/-0.9) mm compared to rigid registration TRE=(3.6+/-1.9) mm, suggesting registration accuracy at or near the voxel size of the patient images (1 x 1 x 2 mm3). The multiscale implementation based on optimal convergence criteria completed registration in 52 s for the cadaveric head and in an average time of 270 s for the larger FOV patient images. CONCLUSIONS Appropriate selection of convergence and multiscale parameters in Demons registration was shown to reduce computational expense without sacrificing registration performance. For intraoperative CBCT imaging with deformable registration, the ability to perform accurate registration within the stringent time requirements of the operating environment could offer a useful clinical tool allowing integration of preoperative information while accurately reflecting changes in the patient anatomy. Similarly for CBCT-guided radiation therapy, fast accurate deformable registration could further augment high-precision treatment strategies.

[1]  R. Castillo,et al.  A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Tom Vercauteren,et al.  Diffeomorphic demons: Efficient non-parametric image registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  X Allen Li,et al.  Automated registration of large deformations for adaptive radiation therapy of prostate cancer. , 2008, Medical physics.

[4]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Investigation of the usability of conebeam CT data sets for dose calculation , 2008, Radiation oncology.

[5]  Quan Chen,et al.  Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: A multi-institution study , 2008 .

[6]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  Diffeomorphic Demons Using ITK's Finite Difference Solver Hierarchy , 2008, The Insight Journal.

[7]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Deformable registration for intra-operative cone-beam CT guidance of head and neck surgery , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Benoît Macq,et al.  Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Registration of 4D Time-Series of Cardiac Images with Multichannel Diffeomorphic Demons , 2008, MICCAI.

[10]  Quan Chen,et al.  Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: a multi-institution study. , 2007, Medical physics.

[11]  Ben Heijmen,et al.  Correction of conebeam CT values using a planning CT for derivation of the "dose of the day". , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Online planning and delivery technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases using cone-beam CT: image quality and system performance. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype. , 2006, Medical physics.

[14]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Intraoperative Cone-beam CT for Guidance of Temporal Bone Surgery , 2006, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[15]  Christopher L. Wyatt,et al.  Deformable Registration of Prone and Supine Colons for CT Colonography , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Investigation of C‐Arm Cone‐Beam CT‐Guided Surgery of the Frontal Recess , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[17]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  M. Oldham,et al.  Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy: technical implementation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  J. H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile C-arm: preclinical investigation in image-guided surgery of the head and neck , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  B. Wilson,et al.  Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery. , 2005, Medical physics.

[21]  J. Wong,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Jay B. West,et al.  The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam CT: a novel imaging technology for image-guided procedures , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. , 2000, Medical physics.

[25]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Understanding the "Demon's Algorithm": 3D Non-rigid Registration by Gradient Descent , 1999, MICCAI.

[26]  N. Ayache,et al.  Fast Non Rigid Matching by Gradient Descent: Study and Improvements of the "Demons" Algorithm , 1999 .

[27]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Fast Non-Rigid Matching of 3D Medical Images , 1995 .

[29]  J. Jost Riemannian geometry and geometric analysis , 1995 .