论文信息 - Benign vs. malignant differentiation of well-circumscribed masses detected on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis - 字舞流文

Benign vs. malignant differentiation of well-circumscribed masses detected on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

K. Yoshimitsu | R. Fujimitsu | Mikiko Shimakura

[1] K. Rahmat,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in combination with 2D mammography for the characterisation of mammographic abnormalities , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[2] E. Conant,et al. BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. , 2017, Radiology.

[3] T. Sugino,et al. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT? , 2017, European Radiology.

[4] Madhavi Raghu,et al. Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time. , 2016, Radiology.

[5] Lorraine Tucker,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool. , 2016, Clinical radiology.

[6] G. Baird,et al. Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2015, Radiology.

[7] Andriy I. Bandos,et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.

[8] B. Seo,et al. Can MR Imaging contribute in characterizing well-circumscribed breast carcinomas? , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.