A Structured Approach to Platform-Driven Product Planning

Abstract: Designing product platforms can be challenging, requiring the design of multiple products to maximize commonality without compromising individual performance. Some suggest that the lack of systematic approaches for defining platforms and related product families has made many companies shy away from platform strategies. This article presents a structured platform identification approach that utilizes questionnaires to assess modularity, as well as a function-based model to explore interdependencies and identify commonalities, while identifying market separator(s) by linking functionalities to anticipate customer needs. This approach is applied in an engineer-to-order company and proved to be successful in conceptualizing platforms and planning for new products.

[1]  Janis Terpenny,et al.  Toward an Information Management Infrastructure for Product Family Planning and Mass Customization , 2004, DAC 2004.

[2]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality Within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm , 2004, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[3]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[4]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Leveraged high-variety strategies: From portfolio thinking to platform thinking , 1998 .

[5]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains , 2008 .

[6]  Janet Efstathiou,et al.  An information‐theoretic methodology for measuring the operational complexity of supplier‐customer systems , 2002 .

[7]  Janis Terpenny,et al.  Online Case Studies and a Process Description for Product Platform Planning , 2005 .

[8]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[9]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Development of a Functional Basis for Design , 2000 .

[10]  Hilda C. Martínez León,et al.  Lean Product Development Research: Current State and Future Directions , 2011 .

[11]  Abd. Rahman Abdul Rahim,et al.  The need for a new product development framework for engineer‐to‐order products , 2003 .

[12]  Prasad K. Yarlagadda,et al.  Product Structure Modelling For The Made-To-Order Environment , 2005 .

[13]  Frederik D. Wiersema,et al.  The Discipline of Market Leaders-Choose your customers , 2015 .

[14]  Harry Boer,et al.  Balanced matrix structure and new product development process at Texas Instruments Materials and Controls Division , 1999 .

[15]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[16]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  An Index-based Method to Manage the Tradeoff between Diversity and Commonality during Product Family Design , 2007, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[17]  Eric Rebentisch,et al.  A Framework for Organizing Lean Product Development , 2011 .

[18]  Giovanni Miragliotta,et al.  Complexity management and supply chain performance assessment. A field study and a conceptual framework , 2004 .

[19]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[20]  Ahm Shamsuzzoha,et al.  Development of modular product architecture through information management , 2012 .

[21]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  The Technical Issues with Implementing Spacecraft Open Avionics Platforms , 2002 .

[22]  J Brecka,et al.  アメリカ人の顧客満足指標(ACSI) 新しい経済指標がUSA企業がいかに顧客を満足させているかを数量化する , 1994 .

[23]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Psychology of Everyday Things , 2012 .

[24]  Dhaval Dalal,et al.  Managing platform architectures and manufacturing processes for nonassembled products , 2002 .

[25]  M. Mcgrath.  Product Strategy for High Technology Companies , 2000 .

[26]  Mark Gershon,et al.  Assessing the Psychometric Properties of Deming's 14 Principles , 1995 .

[27]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Commonality decisions in product family design , 2006 .

[28]  Mustafa Uzumeri,et al.  Managing Product Families , 1996 .

[29]  Frederik D. Wiersema,et al.  Customer intimacy and other value disciplines , 1993 .

[30]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Platform Leadership How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation , 2002 .

[31]  Kevin Otto,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Framework for Screening Preliminary Product Platform Concepts , 2004 .

[32]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  PRODUCT FAMILY AND PLATFORM PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION , 2003, DAC 2003.

[33]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Make Platform Innovation Drive Enterprise Growth , 2001 .

[34]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  Product variety and manufacturing performance: evidence from the international automotive assembly plant study , 1996 .

[35]  T. Simpson.  Methods for Optimizing Product Platforms and Product Families , 2006 .

[36]  Mark V. Martin,et al.  DESIGN FOR VARIETY: DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEXITY INDICES AND DESIGN CHARTS , 1998 .

[37]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Measuring Complexity in High-Technology Manufacturing: Indexes for Evaluation , 1992 .

[38]  Seçkin Polat,et al.  An integrated method for designing modular products , 2004 .

[39]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Assessing and improving commonality and diversity within a product family , 2009, DAC 2006.

[40]  Joseph D. Blackburn,et al.  Concurrent software engineering: prospects and pitfalls , 1996 .