Timing of Transport of Patients with COVID-19

Rationale The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of mortality or ECMO cannulation for patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 transferred from sending hospitals to receiving tertiary care centers as a function of the duration of time at the sending hospital. Objective To determine outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 who were transferred to tertiary or quarternary care medical centers. Materials and Methods Retrospective cohort study of critical care transports of patients to one of seven consortium tertiary care centers from March 1, 2020, through September 4, 2020. Age 14 years and older with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 transported from a sending hospital to a receiving tertiary care center by the critical care transport organization. Results Patients transported with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 to tertiary care centers had a mortality rate of 38.0%. Neither the number of days admitted, nor the number of days intubated at the sending hospital correlated with mortality (correlation coefficient 0.051 and −0.007, respectively). Similarly, neither the number of days admitted, nor number of days intubated at the sending hospital correlated with ECMO cannulation (correlation coefficient 0.008 and −0.036, respectively). Conclusion It may be reasonable to transfer a critically ill COVID-19 patient to a tertiary care center even if they have been admitted at the sending hospital for several days.

[1]  J. Caballero,et al.  Impact of time to intubation on mortality and pulmonary sequelae in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study , 2022, Critical Care.

[2]  T. Johnson,et al.  Interhospital Transfer Outcomes for Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Requiring Mechanical Ventilation , 2021, Critical care explorations.

[3]  Susan R. Wilcox,et al.  Clinical Policies and Procedures for Critical Care Transport during a Respiratory Pandemic , 2021, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[4]  A. Chang,et al.  COVID-19 treatment combinations and associations with mortality in a large multi-site healthcare system , 2021, PLoS ONE.

[5]  A. Kotanidou,et al.  Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies , 2021, Critical Care.

[6]  Susan R. Wilcox,et al.  Critical Care Transport of Patients With COVID-19 , 2021, Journal of intensive care medicine.

[7]  D. King,et al.  Multisystem outcomes and predictors of mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: Demographics and disease acuity matter more than comorbidities or treatment modalities , 2021, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[8]  B. Billah,et al.  Case Fatality Rates for Patients with COVID-19 Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. A Meta-analysis , 2020, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[9]  David J Murphy,et al.  ICU and Ventilator Mortality Among Critically Ill Adults With Coronavirus Disease 2019 , 2020, Critical care medicine.

[10]  Z. Brooks,et al.  COVID-19 Testing , 2020, American journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  So Hee Park,et al.  Age is major factor for predicting survival in patients with acute respiratory failure on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a Korean multicenter study. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[12]  Susan R. Wilcox,et al.  Mortality and Resource Utilization After Critical Care Transport of Patients With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure , 2018, Journal of intensive care medicine.

[13]  R. Hotchkiss,et al.  Lung‐Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department (LOV‐ED): A Quasi‐Experimental, Before‐After Trial , 2017, Annals of emergency medicine.

[14]  Susan R. Wilcox,et al.  Improved Oxygenation After Transport in Patients With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. , 2015, Air Medical Journal.

[15]  M. Beaussier,et al.  A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  A. Serpa Neto,et al.  Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. , 2012, JAMA.

[17]  M. Schull,et al.  Incidence and predictors of critical events during urgent air–medical transport , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[18]  C. Putensen,et al.  Meta-analysis: Ventilation Strategies and Outcomes of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Acute Lung Injury , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  Diana Elbourne,et al.  Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[20]  Albert W. Wu,et al.  Incidents relating to the intra-hospital transfer of critically ill patients , 2004, Intensive Care Medicine.

[21]  D. Schoenfeld,et al.  Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.