Biomarkers in Polycystic Kidney Disease: Are We There?

This article describes the use of prognostic, predictive, and response biomarkers that have been developed for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and their use in clinical care or drug development. We focus on biochemical markers that can be assayed in patients' blood and urine and their association with the outcome of decreased glomerular filtration rate. There have been several studies on prognostic biomarkers. The most promising ones have been markers of tubular injury, inflammation, metabolism, or the vasopressin-urinary concentration axis. So far, none have been shown to be superior to kidney volume-based biomarkers. Several biomarkers are additive to kidney volume and genotype in prognostic models, but there have been few direct comparisons between the biochemical markers to identify the best ones. Moreover, there is a lack of uniformity in the statistical tools used to assess and compare biomarkers. There have been few reports of predictive and response biomarkers, and none are suitable surrogate endpoints. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Biomarker Qualification Program provides a regulatory pathway to approve biomarkers for use across multiple drug-development programs.

[1]  J. Klawitter,et al.  Kynurenines in polycystic kidney disease , 2022, Journal of Nephrology.

[2]  J. D. de Fijter,et al.  Change in Urinary Myoinositol/Citrate Ratio Associates with Progressive Loss of Renal Function in ADPKD Patients , 2022, American Journal of Nephrology.

[3]  M. Rudnicki,et al.  Coregulation Analysis of Mechanistic Biomarkers in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[4]  J. Klawitter,et al.  Metabolic profiling in children and young adults with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[5]  R. Gansevoort,et al.  Use of the Urine-to-Plasma Urea Ratio to Predict ADPKD Progression. , 2021, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[6]  D. Landsittel,et al.  Prognostic Value of Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease , 2021, Kidney international reports.

[7]  Enrico Longato,et al.  A practical perspective on the concordance index for the evaluation and selection of prognostic time-to-event models , 2020, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[8]  D. Landsittel,et al.  The value of genotypic and imaging information to predict functional and structural outcomes in ADPKD. , 2020, JCI insight.

[9]  J. D. de Fijter,et al.  Salt, but not protein intake, is associated with accelerated disease progression in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. , 2020, Kidney international.

[10]  M. Chonchol,et al.  KIM-1 and Kidney Disease Progression in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: HALT-PKD Results , 2020, American Journal of Nephrology.

[11]  J. D. de Fijter,et al.  Urinary metabolites associate with the rate of kidney function decline in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease , 2020, PloS one.

[12]  Y. Pei,et al.  Global microRNA profiling in human urinary exosomes reveals novel disease biomarkers and cellular pathways for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. , 2020, Kidney international.

[13]  R. Gansevoort,et al.  Plasma copeptin levels predict disease progression and tolvaptan efficacy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. , 2019, Kidney international.

[14]  D. Landsittel,et al.  Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor and Decline in Kidney Function in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. , 2019, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[15]  D. Landsittel,et al.  Long-term trajectory of kidney function in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease. , 2019, Kidney international.

[16]  R. Perrone,et al.  Addressing the Need for Clinical Trial End Points in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Report From the Polycystic Kidney Disease Outcomes Consortium (PKDOC). , 2019, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[17]  A. Chapman,et al.  Plasma metabolites and lipids associate with kidney function and kidney volume in hypertensive ADPKD patients early in the disease course , 2019, BMC Nephrology.

[18]  Bonnie L Bullock,et al.  CD8+ T cells modulate autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease progression , 2018, Kidney international.

[19]  C. Podrini,et al.  Metabolism and mitochondria in polycystic kidney disease research and therapy , 2018, Nature Reviews Nephrology.

[20]  Nancy R Cook,et al.  Quantifying the added value of new biomarkers: how and how not , 2018, Diagnostic and Prognostic Research.

[21]  Robert M Califf,et al.  Biomarker definitions and their applications , 2018, Experimental biology and medicine.

[22]  D. Landsittel,et al.  Baseline total kidney volume and the rate of kidney growth are associated with chronic kidney disease progression in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. , 2017, Kidney international.

[23]  J. Burgerhof,et al.  Urinary Biomarkers to Identify Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Patients With a High Likelihood of Disease Progression , 2017, Kidney international reports.

[24]  Kaleab Z. Abebe,et al.  Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 and Kidney Disease Progression in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. , 2017, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[25]  R. Gansevoort,et al.  Can we further enrich autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease clinical trials for rapidly progressive patients? Application of the PROPKD score in the TEMPO trial , 2017, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[26]  C. Llorens-Cortes,et al.  Role of the Vasopressin/Apelin Balance and Potential Use of Metabolically Stable Apelin Analogs in Water Metabolism Disorders , 2017, Front. Endocrinol..

[27]  R. Gansevoort,et al.  Urine Osmolality, Response to Tolvaptan, and Outcome in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Results from the TEMPO 3:4 Trial. , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[28]  R. Gansevoort,et al.  Albuminuria and tolvaptan in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease: results of the TEMPO 3:4 Trial. , 2016, Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation.

[29]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration , 2016, BMJ Open.

[30]  R. Gansevoort,et al.  Prognostic Enrichment Design in Clinical Trials for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: The TEMPO 3:4 Clinical Trial , 2016, Kidney international reports.

[31]  K. Bae,et al.  Urine peptidome analysis predicts risk of end‐stage renal disease and reveals proteolytic pathways involved in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease progression , 2016, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[32]  R. Gansevoort,et al.  Tolvaptan suppresses monocyte chemotactic protein-1 excretion in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease , 2016, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[33]  I. Kocyiğit,et al.  Evaluation of Fibrosis Markers: Apelin and Transforming Growth Factor‐β1 in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Patients , 2016, Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.

[34]  S. Bakker,et al.  Urine and Plasma Osmolality in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Reliable Indicators of Vasopressin Activity and Disease Prognosis? , 2015, American Journal of Nephrology.

[35]  D G Altman,et al.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement , 2015, The British journal of surgery.

[36]  M. Buemi,et al.  Apelin and copeptin: Two opposite biomarkers associated with kidney function decline and cyst growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease , 2013, Peptides.

[37]  J. Li,et al.  Relationship of copeptin, a surrogate marker for arginine vasopressin, with change in total kidney volume and GFR decline in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: results from the CRISP cohort. , 2013, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[38]  D. Wallace,et al.  Macrophages promote polycystic kidney disease progression , 2013, Kidney international.

[39]  A. Boletta,et al.  Defective Glucose Metabolism in Polycystic Kidney Disease Identifies A Novel Therapeutic Paradigm , 2016 .

[40]  C. Ahn,et al.  Urinary N-acetyl-β-D glucosaminidase as a surrogate marker for renal function in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: 1 year prospective cohort study , 2012, BMC Nephrology.

[41]  Yasunori Sato,et al.  Study Designs and Statistical Analyses for Biomarker Research , 2012, Sensors.

[42]  L. Bankir,et al.  Polycystic kidney disease: An early urea-selective urine-concentrating defect in ADPKD , 2012, Nature Reviews Nephrology.

[43]  R. Gansevoort,et al.  Vasopressin, copeptin, and renal concentrating capacity in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease without renal impairment. , 2012, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[44]  Douglas Landsittel,et al.  Kidney volume and functional outcomes in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. , 2012, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[45]  S. Somlo,et al.  Evaluation of urine biomarkers of kidney injury in Polycystic Kidney Disease , 2012, Kidney international.

[46]  L. Cantley,et al.  Macrophages promote cyst growth in polycystic kidney disease. , 2011, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[47]  Diego R. Martín,et al.  Potentially modifiable factors affecting the progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. , 2011, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[48]  Carmine Zoccali,et al.  Statistical methods for the assessment of prognostic biomarkers (Part I): discrimination. , 2010, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[49]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Predictive biomarker validation in practice: lessons from real trials , 2010, Clinical trials.

[50]  F. Harrell,et al.  Criteria for Evaluation of Novel Markers of Cardiovascular Risk: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2009, Circulation.

[51]  Holly Janes,et al.  Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[52]  C. Florkowski Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic tests. , 2008, The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.

[53]  Bernard F King,et al.  Volume progression in polycystic kidney disease. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[54]  S. Nagao,et al.  Increased renal expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and osteopontin in ADPKD in rats. , 2001, Kidney international.

[55]  Bradley J Erickson,et al.  Imaging classification of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a simple model for selecting patients for clinical trials. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[56]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.