The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion

The morphology and function of endothelial cells depends on the physical and chemical characteristics of the extracellular environment. Here, we designed silicon surfaces on which topographical features and surface densities of the integrin binding peptide arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) could be independently controlled. We used these surfaces to investigate the relative importance of the surface chemistry of ligand presentation versus surface topography in endothelial cell adhesion. We compared cell adhesion, spreading and migration on surfaces with nano- to micro-scaled pyramids and average densities of 6×102–6×1011 RGD/mm2. We found that fewer cells adhered onto rough than flat surfaces and that the optimal average RGD density for cell adhesion was 6×105 RGD/mm2 on flat surfaces and substrata with nano-scaled roughness. Only on surfaces with micro-scaled pyramids did the topography hinder cell migration and a lower average RGD density was optimal for adhesion. In contrast, cell spreading was greatest on surfaces with 6×108 RGD/mm2 irrespectively of presence of feature and their size. In summary, our data suggest that the size of pyramids predominately control the number of endothelial cells that adhere to the substratum but the average RGD density governs the degree of cell spreading and length of focal adhesion within adherent cells. The data points towards a two-step model of cell adhesion: the initial contact of cells with a substratum may be guided by the topography while the engagement of cell surface receptors is predominately controlled by the surface chemistry.

[1]  J. Spatz,et al.  Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[2]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  E Ruoslahti,et al.  RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[4]  Fuzhai Cui,et al.  Adhesion of neural cells on silicon wafer with nano-topographic surface , 2002 .

[5]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Statistical correlation between cell adhesion and proliferation on biocompatible metallic materials. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[6]  S. Kabana,et al.  Antihelium-3 production in lead-lead collisions at 158 A GeV/c , 2003 .

[7]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[8]  L. D. Nielsen,et al.  Either exogenous or endogenous fibronectin can promote adherence of human endothelial cells. , 1986, Journal of cell science.

[9]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nanotopography important? , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.

[10]  J. Y. Lim,et al.  Cell sensing and response to micro- and nanostructured surfaces produced by chemical and topographic patterning. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[11]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour. I. Simple step cues. , 1987, Development.

[12]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Networks and crosstalk: integrin signalling spreads , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[13]  R. Nieminen,et al.  Surface morphology during anisotropic wet chemical etching of crystalline silicon , 2003 .

[14]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Reactions of cells to topography. , 1998, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[15]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[16]  Rolando Barbucci,et al.  Micropatterned surfaces for the control of endothelial cell behaviour. , 2002, Biomolecular engineering.

[17]  D. Deligianni,et al.  Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[18]  A F von Recum,et al.  Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  M. Mrksich,et al.  The microenvironment of immobilized Arg-Gly-Asp peptides is an important determinant of cell adhesion. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[20]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell interactions with hierarchically structured nano-patterned adhesive surfaces. , 2009, Soft matter.

[21]  L G Griffith,et al.  Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[22]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Induction of cell polarization and migration by a gradient of nanoscale variations in adhesive ligand spacing. , 2008, Nano letters.

[23]  B. Gumbiner,et al.  Cell Adhesion: The Molecular Basis of Tissue Architecture and Morphogenesis , 1996, Cell.

[24]  Carsten Werner,et al.  Nanoscale features of fibronectin fibrillogenesis depend on protein-substrate interaction and cytoskeleton structure. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[25]  P Connolly,et al.  Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[26]  W. H. Jeu,et al.  Highly Stable Si−C Linked Functionalized Monolayers on the Silicon (100) Surface , 1998 .

[27]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[28]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Using Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers Presenting RGD and (EG)3OH Groups To Characterize Long-Term Attachment of Bovine Capillary Endothelial Cells to Surfaces , 1998 .

[29]  Nanofabrication in cellular engineering , 1998 .

[30]  B D Boyan,et al.  Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[31]  A. Curtis,et al.  Microtopography of metal surfaces influence fibroblast growth by modifying cell shape, cytoskeleton, and adhesion , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Degradation of Micropatterned Surfaces by Cell-Dependent and -Independent Processes † , 2003 .

[33]  A Curtis,et al.  Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[34]  A. S. G. Curtis,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF TOPOGRAPHIC AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS ON CELL BEHAVIOR , 1990 .

[35]  P. Bongrand,et al.  How cells tiptoe on adhesive surfaces before sticking. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Dwayne G Stupack,et al.  ECM Remodeling Regulates Angiogenesis: Endothelial Integrins Look for New Ligands , 2002, Science's STKE.

[37]  D. Brunette,et al.  Effects of a grooved epoxy substratum on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[38]  J. Hubbell,et al.  An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3- mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  D. Stupack,et al.  Integrins and angiogenesis. , 2004, Current topics in developmental biology.

[40]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Lateral spacing of integrin ligands influences cell spreading and focal adhesion assembly. , 2006, European journal of cell biology.

[41]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  RGDS peptides immobilized on titanium alloy stimulate bone cell attachment, differentiation and confer resistance to apoptosis. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[42]  K. Gaus,et al.  Si-C linked oligo(ethylene glycol) layers in silicon-based photonic crystals: optimization for implantable optical materials. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[43]  Katharina Gaus,et al.  Forming Antifouling Organic Multilayers on Porous Silicon Rugate Filters Towards In Vivo/Ex Vivo Biophotonic Devices , 2007 .

[44]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Molecular engineering of cellular environments: cell adhesion to nano-digital surfaces. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[45]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[46]  A. Harris,et al.  Anomalous preferences of cultured macrophages for hydrophobic and roughened substrata. , 1981, Journal of cell science.

[47]  M. Horton,et al.  Skeletal tissues as nanomaterials , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[48]  G. Davis,et al.  Biosynthesis, Remodeling, and Functions During Vascular Morphogenesis and Neovessel Stabilization , 2005 .

[49]  A. Bruinink,et al.  The effect of topographic characteristics on cell migration velocity. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[50]  K. Lounatmaa,et al.  Laminin-10 and Lutheran blood group glycoproteins in adhesion of human endothelial cells. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[51]  J. Benda,et al.  Characterizing short-term release and neovascularization potential of multi-protein growth supplement delivered via alginate hollow fiber devices. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[52]  Virginia Semiconductor Wet-Chemical Etching and Cleaning of Silicon January 2003 , 2004 .

[53]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata. , 1990, Development.

[54]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings , 2004, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.