Clinical Diagnostic Utility of IP-10 and LAM Antigen Levels for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Pleural Effusions in a High Burden Setting

Background Current tools for the diagnosis of tuberculosis pleural effusions are sub-optimal. Data about the value of new diagnostic technologies are limited, particularly, in high burden settings. Preliminary case control studies have identified IFN-γ-inducible-10kDa protein (IP-10) as a promising diagnostic marker; however, its diagnostic utility in a day-to-day clinical setting is unclear. Detection of LAM antigen has not previously been evaluated in pleural fluid. Methods We investigated the comparative diagnostic utility of established (adenosine deaminase [ADA]), more recent (standardized nucleic-acid-amplification-test [NAAT]) and newer technologies (a standardized LAM mycobacterial antigen-detection assay and IP-10 levels) for the evaluation of pleural effusions in 78 consecutively recruited South African tuberculosis suspects. All consenting participants underwent pleural biopsy unless contra-indicated or refused. The reference standard comprised culture positivity for M. tuberculosis or histology suggestive of tuberculosis. Principal Findings Of 74 evaluable subjects 48, 7 and 19 had definite, probable and non-TB, respectively. IP-10 levels were significantly higher in TB vs non-TB participants (p<0.0001). The respective outcomes [sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV %] for the different diagnostic modalities were: ADA at the 30 IU/L cut-point [96; 69; 90; 85], NAAT [6; 93; 67; 28], IP-10 at the 28,170 pg/ml ROC-derived cut-point [80; 82; 91; 64], and IP-10 at the 4035 pg/ml cut-point [100; 53; 83; 100]. Thus IP-10, using the ROC-derived cut-point, missed ∼20% of TB cases and mis-diagnosed ∼20% of non-TB cases. By contrast, when a lower cut-point was used a negative test excluded TB. The NAAT had a poor sensitivity but high specificity. LAM antigen-detection was not diagnostically useful. Conclusion Although IP-10, like ADA, has sub-optimal specificity, it may be a clinically useful rule-out test for tuberculous pleural effusions. Larger multi-centric studies are now required to confirm our findings.

[1]  J. Friedland Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of TB , 2010 .

[2]  T. Bodmer,et al.  Evaluating the potential of IP-10 and MCP-2 as biomarkers for the diagnosis of tuberculosis , 2008, European Respiratory Journal.

[3]  C. Crescioli,et al.  Differences in mesenchymal stem cell cytokine profiles between MS patients and healthy donors: Implication for assessment of disease activity and treatment , 2008, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[4]  A. Ramsay,et al.  Evidence-Based Tuberculosis Diagnosis , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[5]  K Dheda,et al.  Novel tests for diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion: what works and what does not? , 2008, European Respiratory Journal.

[6]  S. Pokkali,et al.  Expression of CXC and CC type of chemokines and its receptors in tuberculous and non-tuberculous effusions. , 2008, Cytokine.

[7]  T. Shim,et al.  Differential cytokine levels and immunoreactivities against Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens between tuberculous and malignant effusions. , 2008, Respiratory medicine.

[8]  G. Ramadori,et al.  NF-κB-dependent synergistic regulation of CXCL10 gene expression by IL-1β and IFN-γ in human intestinal epithelial cell lines , 2007, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[9]  I. Kilty,et al.  The role of IFN-γ in regulation of IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) expression in lung epithelial cell and peripheral blood mononuclear cell co-cultures , 2007, Respiratory research.

[10]  Alimuddin Zumla,et al.  The stability of mRNA encoding IL-4 is increased in pulmonary tuberculosis, while stability of mRNA encoding the antagonistic splice variant, IL-4delta2, is not. , 2007, Tuberculosis.

[11]  Huanzhong Shi,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Interferon-γ in Tuberculous Pleurisy: A Metaanalysis , 2007 .

[12]  S. Sahn,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculous pleural effusion in 2006. , 2007, Chest.

[13]  Ricardo Marques Dias,et al.  Predictive model for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion. , 2007, The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases.

[14]  Huanzhong Shi,et al.  Diagnostic value of interferon-gamma in tuberculous pleurisy: a metaanalysis. , 2007, Chest.

[15]  P. Quaglino,et al.  Expression Pattern of Chemokine Receptors and Chemokine Release in Inflammatory Erythroderma and Sézary Syndrome , 2006, Dermatology.

[16]  M. Pai,et al.  Tuberculosis diagnostics trials: do they lack methodological rigor? , 2006, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[17]  M. Hoelscher,et al.  Detection of mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan with an antigen-capture ELISA in unprocessed urine of Tanzanian patients with suspected tuberculosis. , 2005, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[18]  H. Mukae,et al.  Comparison of BALF concentrations of ENA-78 and IP10 in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. , 2005, Respiratory medicine.

[19]  Tsutomu Kawabe,et al.  Evaluation of interferon-γ, interferon-γ-inducing cytokines, and interferon-γ–inducible chemokines in tuberculous pleural effusions , 2005 .

[20]  T. Kawabe,et al.  Evaluation of interferon-gamma, interferon-gamma-inducing cytokines, and interferon-gamma-inducible chemokines in tuberculous pleural effusions. , 2005, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[21]  A. Banga,et al.  Pleural fluid interferon‐γ and adenosine deaminase levels in tuberculosis pleural effusion: a cost‐effectiveness analysis , 2005, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.

[22]  Diederick E Grobbee,et al.  Test research versus diagnostic research. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[23]  John M Colford,et al.  Nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2004, BMC infectious diseases.

[24]  John M Colford,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculous meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2003, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[25]  S. Greco,et al.  Adenosine deaminase and interferon gamma measurements for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[26]  Manuel Vives,et al.  Differentiating tuberculous from malignant pleural effusions: a scoring model. , 2003, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[27]  E. Coccia,et al.  IFN-αβ Released by Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Infected Human Dendritic Cells Induces the Expression of CXCL10: Selective Recruitment of NK and Activated T Cells 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[28]  E. Coccia,et al.  IFN-alpha beta released by Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected human dendritic cells induces the expression of CXCL10: selective recruitment of NK and activated T cells. , 2003, Journal of immunology.

[29]  C. Chan,et al.  Diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion by the detection of tuberculostearic acid in pleural aspirates. , 1991, Chest.